6881Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 April 2025.#Jakub Cupriak-Trojan and Mateusz Trojan v Wojewoda Mazowiecki.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizens of the same sex who have entered into a marriage in the exercise of that right – Obligation on the part of the Member State of origin to recognise and transcribe the marriage certificate in the civil register – National legislation which does not permit such recognition or transcription on the ground that same-sex marriage is not allowed.#Case C-713/23.cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6883Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 April 2025.###cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6884Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 3 April 2025.#OS v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of voluntary service – Refusal to renew a residence permit – Article 7(1)(e) – Sufficient resources – Supplementary conditions arising from the case-law of a national supreme court – Evidence – Principle of the primacy of EU law.#Case C-525/23.cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6886Case C-807/23, Jones Day: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof – Austria) – Katharina Plavec v Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Lawyers – Lawyer training – Territorial restrictions – National legislation requiring the completion of part of the training period of a trainee lawyer with a lawyer having his or her registered office in the national territory)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6887Case C-710/23, Ministerstvo zdravotnictví (Data concerning the representative of a legal person): Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – L.H. v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4 – Definitions – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 86 – Public access to official documents – Data concerning the representative of a legal person – Case-law of a national court imposing an obligation to inform and consult the data subject prior to disclosure of official documents containing such data)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6888Case C-701/23, Swiftair: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal judiciaire de Paris – France) – Criminal proceedings against Swiftair SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principle ne bis in idem – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Order for provisional dismissal made in a Member State in respect of natural persons deceased and previously employed by a legal person – Criminal proceedings brought against that legal person in another Member State – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6889Case C-686/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 April 2025 – CEVA v Commission (Appeal – Specific programme for research and technological development in the field of research into living resources – SEAPURA project – Grant agreement – Audit report by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Discovery of fraud or financial irregularities – Claim for reimbursement of the European Union contribution – Debit note – Amount receivable by the European Union – Limitation – Contract governed by Belgian law – Opening, in France, of insolvency proceedings against the debtor – Declaration of claim by the European Commission – Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 – Direct application – Interruption of the limitation period under Belgian law)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6890Case C-462/23: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025 – Commission v Bulgaria (Mineral water) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Consumer protection – Directive 2009/54/EC – Article 8(2) – Prohibition on marketing natural mineral water from one and the same spring under more than one trade description – Article 7(2)(b) – Article 9(4)(c) – Labelling requirements – Mandatory information – Name of the spring – Incorrect transposition)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6891Case C-431/23, Wibra België: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal du travail de Liège – Belgium) – AE and Others v BA, acting as insolvency practitioner for WIBRA BELGIË SA and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Transfers of undertakings – Safeguarding of employees’ rights – Directive 2001/23/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of bankruptcy proceedings – Transfer of an undertaking occurring following a declaration of insolvency after that transfer had been prepared in the context of judicial restructuring proceedings)cjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6892Case C-241/22, DX: Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 3 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Netherlands) – DXcjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6893Case T-413/21: Order of the General Court of 3 April 2025 – PASGP Holding and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 апреля 2025 г.
6894Case T-222/25: Action brought on 2 April 2025 – Freixenet v EUIPO – Alvear (CB)cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6895Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 April 2025.#Jacob Cohen Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-34/25 P.cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6896Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 2 avril 2025.#Jacob Cohen Company SpA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-34/25 P.cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6897Case C-249/25, Jilin: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 2 April 2025 – Minister van Asiel en Migratie v UBcjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6898Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MEDISET – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/24.cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6899Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark MEDISET – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-429/24.cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.
6900Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Dmitry Alexandrovich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(f) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(f) and (g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-272/24.cjeu_case · 2 апреля 2025 г.