Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
6505

Case T-249/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Serana Europe v EUIPO – Cytogen Produkte für Medizin + Forschung (Amniogrow) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Amniogrow – Non-registered earlier signs Amniogrow and Amniogrow Plus – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
6507

Case T-241/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – AirPlus International v EUIPO – Repsol (R+) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus CardControl and figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
6508

Case T-95/24: Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2025 – Laura Food v EUIPO – Morghati Abderrahim (THE VERT DE CHINE 4011 ALJAMAL 4011 B 552) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark THE VERT DE CHINE 4011 ALJAMAL 4011 B 552 – Earlier EU figurative marks 4011 B 552 and 4011 B 552 TE VERDE DI CINA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
6509

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#St. Kliment Ohridski Primary Private School EOOD v QX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘service contract’ – Article 2(6) – Enrolment contracts for the schooling of children of compulsory school age – Private education – Article 27 – Inertia selling of services – Compulsory subjects in accordance with national education standards.#Case C-429/24.

cjeu_case ·
6510

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#St. Kliment Ohridski Primary Private School EOOD v QX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘service contract’ – Article 2(6) – Enrolment contracts for the schooling of children of compulsory school age – Private education – Article 27 – Inertia selling of services – Compulsory subjects in accordance with national education standards.#Case C-429/24.

cjeu_case ·
6511

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#AT v CT.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 13(2) – Compensation scheme – Road traffic accident involving a stolen vehicle – Burden of proof in relation to the injured party’s knowledge of the theft of that vehicle – Body responsible for compensation – National legislation interpreted in such a way as to place the burden of proof on the injured party – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-370/24.

cjeu_case ·
6512

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#AT v CT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Lodi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles – Directive 2009/103/EC – Article 13(2) – Compensation scheme – Road traffic accident involving a stolen vehicle – Burden of proof in relation to the injured party’s knowledge of the theft of that vehicle – Body responsible for compensation – National legislation interpreted in such a way as to place the burden of proof on the injured party – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-370/24.

cjeu_case ·
6514

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Celní jednatelství Zelinka s. r. o. v Generální ředitelství cel.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Article 116(7) – Reinstatement of the customs debt – Concept of repayment granted ‘in error’ – Incorrect tariff classification.#Case C-330/24.

cjeu_case ·
6515

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#P. K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – VAT debt of a taxable person – National legislation providing for the joint and several liability of the former chair of the board of directors of the taxable person – Exemption from joint and several liability – Absence of fault – Application for a declaration of insolvency – Existence of only one creditor – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Legal certainty.#Case C-278/24.

cjeu_case ·
6516

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#P. K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – VAT debt of a taxable person – National legislation providing for the joint and several liability of the former chair of the board of directors of the taxable person – Exemption from joint and several liability – Absence of fault – Application for a declaration of insolvency – Existence of only one creditor – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to property – Legal certainty.#Case C-278/24.

cjeu_case ·
6517

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ZZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5i(2)(a) – Prohibition on exporting euro-denominated banknotes – Exemption in case of export necessary for personal use – Banknotes intended to cover medical expenses.#Case C-246/24.

cjeu_case ·
6518

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against ZZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5i(2)(a) – Prohibition on exporting euro-denominated banknotes – Exemption in case of export necessary for personal use – Banknotes intended to cover medical expenses.#Case C-246/24.

cjeu_case ·
6519

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12(2)(b) – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Exclusion from being a refugee – Grounds – Commission of a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his or her admission as a refugee – Effect of the fact that the sentence has been served.#Case C-63/24.

cjeu_case ·
6520

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#K.L. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12(2)(b) – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Exclusion from being a refugee – Grounds – Commission of a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to his or her admission as a refugee – Effect of the fact that the sentence has been served.#Case C-63/24.

cjeu_case ·