6462Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v SX and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2004/80/EC – Article 12(2) – National schemes on compensation to victims of violent intentional crime – Homicide – Compensation for close family members of the deceased – ‘Tiered’ compensation scheme according to the order of succession – National legislation making the payment of compensation to the siblings of the deceased conditional on there being no surviving spouse, children or parents of the deceased and excluding any payment of compensation to the grandparents, uncles or aunts of the deceased – ‘Fair and appropriate’ compensation.#Case C-640/24.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6463Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v SX and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2004/80/EC – Article 12(2) – National schemes on compensation to victims of violent intentional crime – Homicide – Compensation for close family members of the deceased – ‘Tiered’ compensation scheme according to the order of succession – National legislation making the payment of compensation to the siblings of the deceased conditional on there being no surviving spouse, children or parents of the deceased and excluding any payment of compensation to the grandparents, uncles or aunts of the deceased – ‘Fair and appropriate’ compensation.#Case C-640/24.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6464Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Klinka-Geo Trans Földmunkavégző Ipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Obligations of the taxable person – Burden of proof – Principles of proportionality and legal certainty – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Contradiction between national case-law and EU law – Article 267 TFEU – Primacy of EU law – Obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-501/24.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6465Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 May 2025.#Klinka-Geo Trans Földmunkavégző Ipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Obligations of the taxable person – Burden of proof – Principles of proportionality and legal certainty – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Contradiction between national case-law and EU law – Article 267 TFEU – Primacy of EU law – Obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-501/24.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6466Case C-640/24, Giannaro: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione – Italy) – Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri v SX, AQ, BZ (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2004/80/EC – Article 12(2) – National schemes on compensation to victims of violent intentional crime – Homicide – Compensation for close family members of the deceased – Tiered compensation scheme according to the order of succession – National legislation making the payment of compensation to the siblings of the deceased conditional on there being no surviving spouse, children or parents of the deceased and excluding any payment of compensation to the grandparents, uncles or aunts of the deceased – Fair and appropriate compensation)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6467Case C-501/24, Klinka-Geo Trans: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék – Hungary) – Klinka-Geo Trans Földmunkavégző Ipari, Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest lack of jurisdiction – Manifest inadmissibility – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Right to deduct input VAT – Refusal – Obligations of the taxable person – Burden of proof – Principles of proportionality and legal certainty – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Contradiction between national case-law and EU law – Article 267 TFEU – Primacy of EU law – Obligation to make a reference for a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2025 г.
6469Case T-324/25, Novo Banco: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 30 April 2025 – Novo Banco S. A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6470Case T-284/25: Action brought on 30 April 2025 – Amber Latvijas balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK)cjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6473Case T-278/25: Action brought on 30 April 2025 – Duchenne Research & Advocacy v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6474Case C-312/25 P: Appeal brought on 30 April 2025 by EN against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 February 2025 in Case T-366/24, EN v Court of Justice of the European Unioncjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6475Case C-311/25: Action brought on 30 April 2025 – European Commission v Republic of Polandcjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6476Case C-310/25, MMWB: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hagen (Germany) lodged on 30 April 2025 – MMWB GmbH & Co. KG v ELcjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6477Case C-309/25, Enefit Green: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Satversmes tiesa (Latvia) lodged on 30 April 2025 – Enefit Green SIA, Utilitas Wind SIA, TCK SIA, Sabiedrības ar ierobežotu atbildību VĒJA PARKS 10, EKO Ziemeļi SIA v Ministru kabinetscjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6478Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 30 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against M. S. T.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad (Bulgaria).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial and the consequences of non-appearance – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding reasonable efforts made by the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a decision in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial or to another legal remedy which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case – Judicial proceedings to determine whether a right to a new trial exists – Obligation to act with speed.#Case C-135/25 PPU.cjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6479Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Mobility Trader Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark hey car select – Earlier national figurative mark geicar vehículos seminuevos y de ocasión – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-338/24.cjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.
6480Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Mobility Trader Holding GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark hey car select – Earlier national figurative mark geicar vehículos seminuevos y de ocasión – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-338/24.cjeu_case · 30 апреля 2025 г.