6241Case T-227/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Smart Kid v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to discussions between the Commission and a direct competitor of the applicant – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6242Case T-9/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Zardini v Commission (Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6243Case T-4/24: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LA v Commission (Civil Service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6244Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#LD v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-1184/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6245Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#LD v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-1184/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6246Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6247Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Taxolutions BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity.#Case T-1154/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6248Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Matina Stevi and The New York Times Company v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer – Refusal to grant access – Presumption of veracity attached to the declaration of non-possession of documents – Lack of plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession – Retention of documents – Principle of good administration.#Case T-36/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6249Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Matina Stevi and The New York Times Company v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer – Refusal to grant access – Presumption of veracity attached to the declaration of non-possession of documents – Lack of plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession – Retention of documents – Principle of good administration.#Case T-36/23.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6250Case T-1184/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – LD v Commission (Civil service – Officials – Recruitment – Open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list – Rules on languages – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6251Case T-1154/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Taxolutions v EUIPO – Haufe-Lexware (TAXMARC) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TAXMARC – Earlier EU figurative mark X TAXMAN – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Relevant public – Conceptual similarity)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6252Case T-36/23: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Stevi and The New York Times v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the text messages exchanged between the President of the Commission and the chief executive officer of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer – Refusal to grant access – Presumption of veracity attached to the declaration of non-possession of documents – Lack of plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession – Retention of documents – Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6253Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Telly s. r. o. and Česká asociace satelitních operátorů z. s. v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – State aid – Digital terrestrial television (DTT) – Extension by the Czech Republic of frequency usage rights allocated to certain operators for the broadcasting of DTT – Decision finding no State aid – Provider of satellite and internet television services – Trade association – Locus standi – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-362/21 and T-363/21.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6254Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Telly s. r. o. and Česká asociace satelitních operátorů z. s. v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – State aid – Digital terrestrial television (DTT) – Extension by the Czech Republic of frequency usage rights allocated to certain operators for the broadcasting of DTT – Decision finding no State aid – Provider of satellite and internet television services – Trade association – Locus standi – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-362/21 and T-363/21.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6255Joined Cases T-362/21 and T-363/21: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025 – Telly and Česká asociace satelitních operátorů v Commission (Actions for annulment – State aid – Digital terrestrial television (DTT) – Extension by the Czech Republic of frequency usage rights allocated to certain operators for the broadcasting of DTT – Decision finding no State aid – Provider of satellite and internet television services – Trade association – Locus standi – No individual concern – Non-regulatory act – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6256Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 May 2025.#La Banque postale v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-449/20.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6257Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 May 2025.#La Banque postale v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-449/20.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6258Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 May 2025.#BPCE and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-448/20.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6259Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 May 2025.#BPCE and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-448/20.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.
6260Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 May 2025.#BNP Paribas v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2020 ex ante contributions – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Action manifestly well founded – Limitation of the temporal effects of the order.#Case T-447/20.cjeu_case · 14 мая 2025 г.