Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
5761

Case C-629/23, Eesti Suurkiskjad: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus – Estonia) – MTÜ Eesti Suurkiskjad v Keskkonnaamet (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – First subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Conservation status of a species – Concept – Article 14 – Management measures – Taking in the wild and exploitation compatible with the maintenance or restoration of the species at a favourable conservation status – Second subparagraph of Article 1(i) – Assessment whether the conservation status of the species concerned is favourable – Cumulative conditions – Canis lupus (wolf) – Classification in the vulnerable category of the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List – Animal species forming part of a population whose natural range extends beyond the territory of a Member State – Taking account of exchanges with populations of the same species present in neighbouring Member States or in third countries – Article 2(3) – Taking account of economic, social and cultural requirements and regional and local characteristics)

cjeu_case ·
5763

Case C-364/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025 – ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office (Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning)

cjeu_case ·
5769

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#MSG Frucht GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Götterfrucht – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No recourse to oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/24.

cjeu_case ·
5770

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#MSG Frucht GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Götterfrucht – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No recourse to oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/24.

cjeu_case ·
5771

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – Transport – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Call for proposals CEF‑T‑2023‑COREGEN – ‘Tren de Gran Canaria’ project – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal for failure to comply with the conditions of admissibility – Late submission of a document required by the call for proposals – Request for review – Circumscribed powers – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-335/24.

cjeu_case ·
5772

Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 11 juin 2025.#Ferrocarriles de Gran Canaria, SA contre Agence exécutive européenne pour le climat, les infrastructures et l’environnement.#Recours en annulation – Transports – Mécanisme pour l’interconnexion en Europe (MIE) – Appel à propositions CEF‑T‑2023‑COREGEN – Projet « Tren de Gran Canaria » – Rejet de la proposition du requérant pour non-respect des conditions de recevabilité – Présentation tardive d’un document exigé par l’appel à propositions – Demande de réexamen – Compétence liée – Incompétence manifeste partielle – Recours en partie manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-335/24.

cjeu_case ·
5775

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-462/24.

cjeu_case ·
5776

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-462/24.

cjeu_case ·
5777

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-461/24.

cjeu_case ·
5778

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Pure Steel+ – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-461/24.

cjeu_case ·
5779

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#EO v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Obligation to state reasons – Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of power or abuse of process – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Material and non-material harm.#Case T-368/24.

cjeu_case ·
5780

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#EO v European Parliament.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Obligation to state reasons – Article 3 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of power or abuse of process – Presumption of innocence – Right to be heard – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Liability – Material and non-material harm.#Case T-368/24.

cjeu_case ·