Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
5627

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ministère public v KN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Mutual trust – Obligation to take account of the grounds on which the previous decision refusing extradition was based – No obligation of mutual recognition of that decision.#Case C-219/25 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
5628

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ministère public v KN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Mutual trust – Obligation to take account of the grounds on which the previous decision refusing extradition was based – No obligation of mutual recognition of that decision.#Case C-219/25 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
5629

Case C-219/25 PPU, Kamekris: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the investigating chamber of the cour d’appel de Montpellier – France) in the proceedings concerning the extradition of KN (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to a fair trial – Mutual trust – Obligation to take account of the grounds on which the previous decision refusing extradition was based – No obligation of mutual recognition of that decision)

cjeu_case ·
5630

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Société Nouvelle de l’Hôtel Plaza SAS v YG and Pôle emploi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘workers normally employed’ – Workers supplied by an external undertaking under a contract for the provision of services – Method of calculating the number of those workers in the establishment – No specific obligation imposed by that directive in respect of a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings – Inapplicability of that directive – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-419/24.

cjeu_case ·
5631

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Société Nouvelle de l’Hôtel Plaza SAS v YG and Pôle emploi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘workers normally employed’ – Workers supplied by an external undertaking under a contract for the provision of services – Method of calculating the number of those workers in the establishment – No specific obligation imposed by that directive in respect of a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings – Inapplicability of that directive – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-419/24.

cjeu_case ·
5632

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#mBank S.A. and Others v BL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#Case C-396/24.

cjeu_case ·
5633

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#mBank S.A. and Others v BL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#Case C-396/24.

cjeu_case ·
5634

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 4(4)(b) – Commercial transactions between undertakings and public authorities – Power conferred on Member States to extend up to a maximum of 60 calendar days the time limit for payment for public entities providing healthcare – Duty of Member States to ensure that those public entities do not in practice exceed that time limit.#Case C-317/24.

cjeu_case ·
5636

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 8(1) – Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession – National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof – Restriction – Whether justified – Protection of public health.#Case C-200/24.

cjeu_case ·
5637

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 8(1) – Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession – National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof – Restriction – Whether justified – Protection of public health.#Case C-200/24.

cjeu_case ·
5638

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 19 juin 2025.#CeramTec GmbH contre Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marque de l’Union européenne – Règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Causes de nullité absolue – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b) – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous e), ii) – Signe constitué exclusivement par la forme du produit nécessaire à l’obtention d’un résultat technique – Mauvaise foi du demandeur – Autonomie et coexistence des causes de nullité absolue – Critères pertinents aux fins de l’appréciation de la mauvaise foi du demandeur lors du dépôt de la demande de marque – Survenance d’éléments postérieurement à ce dépôt.#Affaire C-17/24.

cjeu_case ·
5639

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#CeramTec GmbH v Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) and (b) – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Bad faith of the applicant – Autonomy and coexistence of the absolute grounds for invalidity – Criteria relevant to determining whether an applicant is acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark – Matters arising after that application is filed.#Case C-17/24.

cjeu_case ·
5640

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 19 June 2025.#LF v Sanofi Pasteur SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Rouen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Liability for defective products – Directive 85/374/EEC – Article 13 – Relationship with the fault-based liability system – Fault by the producer linked to the defective nature of the product – Article 10 – Starting point of the three-year limitation period in the case of damage consisting in a progressive illness – Concept of ‘becoming aware of the damage’ – Article 11 – Extinguishment of the rights of the injured person – Validity – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of access to a court.#Case C-338/24.

cjeu_case ·