Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
5521

Case T-484/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – FF v Eurojust and Europol (Sky ECC III) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
5522

Case T-148/24: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2025 – CW v Europol and Eurojust (EncroChat) (Non-contractual liability – Cooperation between police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – No non-material damage suffered as a result of acts of Europol – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
5525

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 26 June 2025.#Criminal proceedings v HG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Firenze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2014/41/EU – European Investigation Order in criminal matters – Article 3 – Material scope – Concept of ‘investigative measure’ – Purpose – Obtaining evidence – Article 10 – Recourse to a different type of investigative measure – Article 11 – Grounds for non-recognition or non-execution – Fundamental rights – Article 22 – Temporary transfer to the issuing State of the person held in custody for the purpose of carrying out an investigative measure – Article 24 – Hearing of the accused person by videoconference – Article 24(2)(b) – Fundamental principles of the law of the executing Member State.#Case C-325/24.

cjeu_case ·
5526

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 26 June 2025.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Russian nationals, who is the chair and the chief executive officer of that administrative board, is also sole administrator of the parent company of the company concerned.#Case C-313/24.

cjeu_case ·
5528

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-776/23 P to C-780/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
5529

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-776/23 P to C-780/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
5530

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.

cjeu_case ·
5531

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.

cjeu_case ·
5532

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#SALUS Haus Dr. med Otto Greither Nachf. GmbH & Co.KG v Astrid Twardy GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(29) – Article 16a – Traditional herbal medicinal products – Article 62 – Information which is useful to the patient – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 2(1) – Scope – Indications on the outer packaging of a medicinal herbal tea – Use of terms referring to organic production.#Case C-618/23.

cjeu_case ·
5533

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#SALUS Haus Dr. med Otto Greither Nachf. GmbH & Co.KG v Astrid Twardy GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 1(29) – Article 16a – Traditional herbal medicinal products – Articles 62 – Information which is useful to the patient – Regulation (EU) 2018/848 – Article 2(1) – Scope – Indications on the outer packaging of a medicinal herbal tea – Use of terms referring to organic production.#Case C-618/23.

cjeu_case ·
5534

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#Makeleio EPE and Zougla G.R. AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media service providers – National legislation requiring respect for human dignity and prohibiting the broadcasting of content of poor quality – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – Limits – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Principle of legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-555/23 and C-556/23.

cjeu_case ·
5535

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#Makeleio EPE and Zougla G.R. AE v Ethniko Symvoulio Radiotileorasis (ESR).#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media service providers – National legislation requiring respect for human dignity and prohibiting the broadcasting of content of poor quality – Principle of interpreting national law in conformity with EU law – Limits – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Principle of legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-555/23 and C-556/23.

cjeu_case ·