5421Case C-436/25 P: Appeal brought on 2 July 2025 by EXOIL Paliwa sp. z o.o. against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 13 May 2025 in Case T-206/25, EXOIL Paliwa sp. z o.o. v Republic of Polandcjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5422Case C-435/25, Gut gekauft Reformhäuser: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 2 July 2025 – Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb e.V. v GUT GEKAUFT Reformhäuser GmbHcjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5423Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Lunar Outpost Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LUNAR OUTPOST – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-513/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5424Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Lunar Outpost Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark LUNAR OUTPOST – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-513/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5425Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Villafrut Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JOLi – Earlier national word mark JOLIFE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-473/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5426Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Villafrut Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark JOLi – Earlier national word mark JOLIFE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-473/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5427Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark VITAE – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-402/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5428Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark VITAE – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-402/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5429Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Camilla and Marc Operations Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark C&M – Earlier EU word mark C&A – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Visual and phonetic similarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-380/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5430Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Camilla and Marc Operations Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark C&M – Earlier EU word mark C&A – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Visual and phonetic similarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-380/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5431Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2025.#Brasserie Nationale (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding) and Munhowen SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for the wholesale distribution of beverages – Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Referral request to the Commission from a Member State competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Commission decision to examine the concentration – Time limit for submitting the referral request – Concept of ‘made known’ – Informing the undertakings concerned of the referral request – Language rules – Time limit for notifying the Commission decision to examine the concentration – Effect on trade between Member States – Threat of a significant effect on competition – Appropriateness of the referral.#Case T-289/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5432Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 July 2025.#Brasserie Nationale (anc. Brasseries Funck-Bricher et Bofferding) and Munhowen SA v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for the wholesale distribution of beverages – Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Referral request to the Commission from a Member State competition authority not having competence under national law to examine the concentration – Commission decision to examine the concentration – Time limit for submitting the referral request – Concept of ‘made known’ – Informing the undertakings concerned of the referral request – Language rules – Time limit for notifying the Commission decision to examine the concentration – Effect on trade between Member States – Threat of a significant effect on competition – Appropriateness of the referral.#Case T-289/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5433Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#UV and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – The 2004 and 2014 reforms of the Staff Regulations – Transitional measures relating to certain details in the calculation of pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of the temporary staff who have become officials – Annual rate of acquisition of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-253/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5434Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#UV and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – The 2004 and 2014 reforms of the Staff Regulations – Transitional measures relating to certain details in the calculation of pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of the temporary staff who have become officials – Annual rate of acquisition of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-253/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5435Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Gianfranco Emanuele and Dorte Hansen v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Temporary agents who become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-228/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5436Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#Gianfranco Emanuele and Dorte Hansen v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Temporary agents who become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-228/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5437Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#DB and Others v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Temporary agents who become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-152/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5438Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#DB and Others v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations of 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods for calculating pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Temporary agents who become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-152/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5439Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#CR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations in 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods of calculation of pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of contract staff who have become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-131/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.
5440Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2025.#CR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Reforms of the Staff Regulations in 2004 and 2014 – Transitional measures relating to certain methods of calculation of pension rights – Article 28 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations – Members of contract staff who have become officials – Annual rate of accrual of pension rights – Retirement age – Scope of the law – Equal treatment.#Case T-131/24.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2025 г.