4881Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Possibility of recourse to arbitration – Arbitration between individuals – Imposed arbitration – Decision of a body of an international sports federation imposing a sanction – Award by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld by a decision of a court of a third State – Legal remedy against the arbitral award – National legislation conferring on that arbitral award the authority of res judicata between the parties and probative value vis-à-vis third parties – Powers and obligations of the national courts before which that arbitral award is relied on – Effective review of the consistency of such an arbitral award with the principles and provisions falling under EU public policy.#Case C-600/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4882Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EU) No 165/2014 – Obligation periodically to inspect tachographs – Exemption – Last sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 51(1) thereof – Principle lex posterior mitius – Administrative penalties of a criminal nature – Appeal in cassation – New law having entered into force after the ruling which is the subject of that appeal – Concept of ‘final conviction’.#Case C-544/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4883Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.T. and BAJI Trans, s.r. o. v Národný inšpektorát práce.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EU) No 165/2014 – Obligation periodically to inspect tachographs – Exemption – Last sentence of Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 51(1) thereof – Principle lex posterior mitius – Administrative penalties of a criminal nature – Appeal in cassation – New law having entered into force after the ruling which is the subject of that appeal – Concept of ‘final conviction’.#Case C-544/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4884Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Tiberis Holding Srl v Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Article 4 – National incentives for the production of energy from renewable sources – Aid scheme – State aid – Article 108 TFEU – Exclusive competence of the European Commission to rule on the compatibility of aid measures with the internal market – Commission decision finding such an aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought before a national court by a beneficiary of aid under that scheme challenging a modality of that scheme which is inextricably linked to its functioning – Inadmissibility, in the context of that action, of a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of those provisions of those directives.#Case C-514/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4885Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Tiberis Holding Srl v Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Article 4 – National incentives for the production of energy from renewable sources – Aid scheme – State aid – Article 108 TFEU – Exclusive competence of the European Commission to rule on the compatibility of aid measures with the internal market – Commission decision finding such an aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Action brought before a national court by a beneficiary of aid under that scheme challenging a modality of that scheme which is inextricably linked to its functioning – Inadmissibility, in the context of that action, of a request for a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of those provisions of those directives.#Case C-514/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4886Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Határ Diszkont Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 1(2), Article 2(1)(c) and Article 78 – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Exempt supply of goods – Service for the administration of VAT refunds to customers not resident in the European Union – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Principal or ancillary supply – Exemptions under Article 135(1)(d) and Article 146(1)(e) – Protection of legitimate expectations – Taxable amount.#Case C-427/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4887Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Határ Diszkont Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 1(2), Article 2(1)(c) and Article 78 – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Exempt supply of goods – Service for the administration of VAT refunds to customers not resident in the European Union – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Principal or ancillary supply – Exemptions under Article 135(1)(d) and Article 146(1)(e) – Protection of legitimate expectations – Taxable amount.#Case C-427/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4888Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Principles of the irremovability and independence of judges – Unconsented appointment of a judge of a supreme court to sit, for a fixed term, in another chamber of that court – Primacy of EU law – Public procurement – Directive 2004/17/EC – Public procurement procedures – Application to an agreement transferring ownership rights relating to green electricity certificates – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Review procedures in public procurement – Contract having no legal effect – Contracting entity seeking the annulment of a contract concluded in breach of public procurement rules – Abuse of rights – None.#Joined Cases C-422/23, C-455/23, C-459/23 and C-486/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4889Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#T.B. and Others v T. S.A. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#References for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Principles of the irremovability and independence of judges – Unconsented appointment of a judge of a supreme court to sit, for a fixed term, in another chamber of that court – Primacy of EU law – Public procurement – Directive 2004/17/EC – Public procurement procedures – Application to an agreement transferring ownership rights relating to green electricity certificates – Directive 92/13/EEC – Article 2d(1) – Review procedures in public procurement – Contract having no legal effect – Contracting entity seeking the annulment of a contract concluded in breach of public procurement rules – Abuse of rights – None.#Joined Cases C-422/23, C-455/23, C-459/23 and C-486/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4890Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Free movement of persons – Article 18 TFEU – Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Principle of equal treatment – Minor child who is a Union citizen with a right of residence under that directive – Grant of a national residence permit to the parent of that child so that the parent can exercise parental authority over that child – Distinction based on the nationality of the child – Parent with a right of residence as a job-seeker – Derogation from the principle of equal treatment as regards entitlement to social assistance – Scope.#Case C-397/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4891Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#FL v Jobcenter Arbeitplus Bielefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sozialgericht Detmold.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Free movement of persons – Article 18 TFEU – Prohibition of discrimination based on nationality – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 24 – Principle of equal treatment – Minor child who is a Union citizen with a right of residence under that directive – Grant of a national residence permit to the parent of that child so that the parent can exercise parental authority over that child – Distinction based on the nationality of the child – Parent with a right of residence as a job-seeker – Derogation from the principle of equal treatment as regards entitlement to social assistance – Scope.#Case C-397/23.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4892Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Statement of reasons.#Case C-102/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4893Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Statement of reasons.#Case C-102/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4894Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-101/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4895Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-101/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4896Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-100/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4897Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-100/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4898Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-99/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4899Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#PNB Banka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Procedural rights – Effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case C-99/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.
4900Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/217 – Classification of titanium dioxide in powder form containing 1% or more of particles of a diameter equal to or below 10 μm – Criteria for classification of a substance as carcinogenic – Reliability and acceptability of scientific studies – Calculation of lung overload in particles – ‘Decisive’ nature of a scientific study – Distortion of the evidence – Error of law – Choice of calculation parameters – Particle density – Scientific assessment – Exceeding the limits of judicial review – Concept of ‘intrinsic properties’ – Grounds included for the sake of completeness.#Case C-71/23 P.cjeu_case · 1 августа 2025 г.