Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
4861

Joined Cases C-92/24 to C-94/24, Banca Mediolanum: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di giustizia tributaria di secondo grado della Lombardia – Italy) – Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione regionale della Lombardia (References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50 % of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax)

cjeu_case ·
4862

Case C-76/24, Tradeinn Retail Services: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Tradeinn Retail Services S.L. v PH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks – Article 10(3)(b) – Rights conferred by a trade mark – Right to prevent a third party from offering the goods, putting them on the market or stocking them for those purposes under the sign – Online trade – Goods offered for sale from a Member State other than that in which the mark is registered – Concept of stocking)

cjeu_case ·
4863

Case C-70/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Spain (Work-life balance directive) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum and a daily penalty payment – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)

cjeu_case ·
4864

Case C-69/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – European Commission v Ireland (Directive on work-life balance) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)

cjeu_case ·
4865

Case C-68/24: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025 – Commission v Belgium (Work-life balance directive) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Work-life balance for parents and carers – Directive (EU) 2019/1158 – Article 20(1) – Failure to transpose and notify transposition measures – Article 260(3) TFEU – Application for the imposition of a lump sum – Criteria for establishing the amount of the penalty)

cjeu_case ·
4866

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 1er août 2025.#Finanzamt Österreich contre P GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 203 – Mention d’un montant de TVA erroné sur la facture – Article 238 – Facturation simplifiée – Prestations facturées à des personnes non assujetties et à des assujettis ne bénéficiant pas d’un droit à déduction de la TVA – Obligation de payer la partie de la TVA facturée à tort – Absence de risque de perte de recettes fiscales.#Affaire C-794/23.

cjeu_case ·
4867

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Finanzamt Österreich v P GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Incorrect amount of VAT entered on the invoice – Article 238 – Simplified invoicing – Services invoiced to non‑taxable persons and to taxable persons who do not have a right to deduct VAT – Obligation to pay the part of the VAT invoiced incorrectly – No risk of loss of tax revenue.#Case C-794/23.

cjeu_case ·
4868

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva v Keskkonnaamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Prohibitions to ensure the protection of birds – Article 9 – Derogations – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition on felling trees during the period of bird breeding and rearing.#Case C-784/23.

cjeu_case ·
4869

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva v Keskkonnaamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Prohibitions to ensure the protection of birds – Article 9 – Derogations – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition on felling trees during the period of bird breeding and rearing.#Case C-784/23.

cjeu_case ·
4870

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association in the case of two people who have a family relationship’.#Case C-703/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4871

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Concept of ‘association in the case of two people who have a family relationship’.#Case C-703/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4872

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(a) and (d) – Inclusion of the appellant’s name due to his support for the actions or policies of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and to the material or financial support provided to Russian decision-makers – Effect of the appellant’s failure to distance himself and of his passive attitude.#Case C-702/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4873

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(a) and (d) – Inclusion of the appellant’s name due to his support for the actions or policies of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and to the material or financial support provided to Russian decision-makers – Effect of the appellant’s failure to distance himself and of his passive attitude.#Case C-702/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
4874

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 1er août 2025.#CM et DS contre Volkswagen AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Réception des véhicules à moteur – Directive 2007/46/CE – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Article 26, paragraphe 1 – Article 46 – Règlement (CE) no 715/2007 – Article 5, paragraphe 2 – Véhicules à moteur – Moteur diesel – Émissions de polluants – Réduction des émissions d’oxyde d’azote (NOx) limitée par une “fenêtre de températures” – Dispositif d’invalidation – Protection des intérêts d’un acheteur individuel d’un véhicule équipé d’un dispositif d’invalidation illicite – Installation de ce dispositif après la mise en service du véhicule – Droit à réparation au titre de la responsabilité délictuelle du constructeur de ce véhicule – Cause d’exonération – Erreur insurmontable du constructeur quant à l’illicéité du dispositif d’invalidation – Principe d’effectivité – Réparation adéquate du dommage – Mode de calcul de la réparation – Fourchette d’indemnisation.#Affaire C-666/23.

cjeu_case ·
4875

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#CM and DS v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Installation of that device after the vehicle’s entry into service – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Ground for exemption – Unavoidable error on the part of the manufacturer as regards the unlawfulness of the defeat device – Principle of effectiveness – Adequate compensation for the loss or damage – Method of calculating compensation – Compensation bracket.#Case C-666/23.

cjeu_case ·
4876

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for unauthorised payment transactions – Successive unauthorised payment transactions resulting from the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of a payment instrument – Delayed notification without intent or gross negligence – Scope of the right to a refund.#Case C-665/23.

cjeu_case ·
4877

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for unauthorised payment transactions – Successive unauthorised payment transactions resulting from the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of a payment instrument – Delayed notification without intent or gross negligence – Scope of the right to a refund.#Case C-665/23.

cjeu_case ·
4878

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

cjeu_case ·
4879

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W and X v Belgische Staat and État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen and Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2008/115/EC – Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 3(4) and (6), Article 7(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and (2), Article 11(1) and Article 13 – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Return decision – Decision not to grant a period for voluntary departure – Entry ban – Actionable administrative act – Enforceability of a return decision not containing a provision relating to the period for voluntary departure – Right to an effective remedy – Entry ban decision adopted after a considerable period of time.#Joined Cases C-636/23 and C-637/23.

cjeu_case ·
4880

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19(1) TEU – Obligation of Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Possibility of recourse to arbitration – Arbitration between individuals – Imposed arbitration – Decision of a body of an international sports federation imposing a sanction – Award by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld by a decision of a court of a third State – Legal remedy against the arbitral award – National legislation conferring on that arbitral award the authority of res judicata between the parties and probative value vis-à-vis third parties – Powers and obligations of the national courts before which that arbitral award is relied on – Effective review of the consistency of such an arbitral award with the principles and provisions falling under EU public policy.#Case C-600/23.

cjeu_case ·