Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
4581

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Starbuzz Tobacco, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Discovery – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Nature of use – Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the trade mark was registered – Independent subcategory of goods.#Case T-404/24.

cjeu_case ·
4584

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025 (Extracts).#Juan Costa Pujadas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a speed variator – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Visible features of a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘normal use’ and ‘visibility’ – Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Burden of proof.#Case T-331/24.

cjeu_case ·
4585

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025 (Extracts).#Juan Costa Pujadas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a speed variator – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Visible features of a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘normal use’ and ‘visibility’ – Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Burden of proof.#Case T-331/24.

cjeu_case ·
4586

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2025 (Extracts).#Juan Costa Pujadas v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a speed variator – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Visible features of a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘normal use’ and ‘visibility’ – Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Burden of proof.#Case T-331/24.

cjeu_case ·
4591

Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 3 septembre 2025.#Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl contre Commission européenne.#Accès aux documents – Règlement (CE) no 1049/2001 – Documents relatifs à des procédures en matière d’aides d’État – Décisions fiscales anticipatives – Refus d’accès – Exception relative à la protection des intérêts commerciaux d’un tiers – Exception relative à la protection des objectifs des activités d’inspection, d’enquête et d’audit – Présomption générale de confidentialité – Absence de caractère irréfragable – Intérêt public supérieur – Principe de bonne administration – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire T-225/24.

cjeu_case ·
4592

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to State aid procedures – Advance tax agreements – Refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – General presumption of confidentiality – Not irrebuttable – Overriding public interest – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-225/24.

cjeu_case ·
4593

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#DF v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Recruitment – Refusal to employ on the ground that the candidate is physically unfit to perform duties – Opinion of the Medical Committee – Extent of the Medical Committee’s competence – Comprehensible link between the medical findings and the conclusion as to unfitness – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-153/24.

cjeu_case ·
4595

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

cjeu_case ·
4596

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.

cjeu_case ·
4597

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

cjeu_case ·
4598

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.

cjeu_case ·
4599

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

cjeu_case ·
4600

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.

cjeu_case ·