4501Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-625/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4502Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-625/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4503Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4504Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4505Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Ministero della Giustizia v NZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to prevent and penalise misuse of successive fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Assessment procedure in order to be permanently confirmed as an honorary member of the judiciary – Waiver, by operation of law, of claims arising from service as an honorary member of the judiciary prior to the assessment procedure – Loss of a right to paid annual leave conferred by EU law.#Case C-253/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4506Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Ministero della Giustizia v NZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di L’Aquila.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Honorary and ordinary members of the judiciary – Clause 5 – Measures intended to prevent and penalise misuse of successive fixed-term contracts – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Assessment procedure in order to be permanently confirmed as an honorary member of the judiciary – Waiver, by operation of law, of claims arising from service as an honorary member of the judiciary prior to the assessment procedure – Loss of a right to paid annual leave conferred by EU law.#Case C-253/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4507Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#RT and ED v Ineo Infracom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘redundancy’ – Collective internal mobility agreement – Redundancies for economic reasons based on the refusal to apply that agreement – Termination of the employment contract on the employer’s initiative for one or more reasons not related to the individual workers concerned – Article 2 – Procedures for information and consultation with workers’ representatives.#Case C-249/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4508Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#RT and ED v Ineo Infracom.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Article 1(1) – Scope – Concept of ‘redundancy’ – Collective internal mobility agreement – Redundancies for economic reasons based on the refusal to apply that agreement – Termination of the employment contract on the employer’s initiative for one or more reasons not related to the individual workers concerned – Article 2 – Procedures for information and consultation with workers’ representatives.#Case C-249/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4509Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set.#Case C-211/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4510Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#LEGO A/S v Pozitív Energiaforrás Kft.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Community design – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 8(3) – Design allowing the multiple assembly or connection of mutually interchangeable products within a modular system – Scope of the protection conferred by such a design – Article 10 – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Article 89(1) – Sanctions in actions for infringement – Special reasons allowing the national court not to make the orders provided for in that provision – Infringement in respect of the pieces of a toy building set, the number of which is small in relation to total number of components of that set.#Case C-211/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4511Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4512Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4513Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 10 – Temporal application.#Case C-21/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4514Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#CP v Nissan Iberia SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 1 de Zaragoza.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness – Actions for damages for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union – Limitation period – Determination of the dies a quo – Knowledge of the information necessary for bringing an action for damages – Publication on the website of a national competition authority of its decision finding an infringement of the competition rules – Binding effect of a decision of a national competition authority which is not yet final – Suspension or interruption of the limitation period – Stay of the main proceedings before the court hearing an action for damages – Directive 2014/104/EU – Article 10 – Temporal application.#Case C-21/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4515Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4516Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4517Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4518Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 4 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4519Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 4 September 2025.#Republik Österreich v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 549/2004 – Single European sky – Regulation (EC) No 550/2004 – Provision of air navigation services in the single European sky – Article 8 – Air traffic service providers – Articles 14 and 15 – Charges payable by airspace users – Failure of an aeronautical telecommunications server – Cancellation of flights – Alleged culpable negligence on the part of the provider concerned – Airspace users – Protection of those users against the material damage caused by such negligence.#Case C-408/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.
4520Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 4 September 2025.#CL v Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Scope – Processing of data collected in the course of an investigation against a police officer as a person suspected of a criminal offence – Recording of data relating to this investigation in the police officer’s personnel file – Lawfulness of processing – Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and Article 6(3) of that regulation – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation – Legal basis for the processing – Article 17 of that regulation – Right to erasure.#Case C-312/24.cjeu_case · 4 сентября 2025 г.