4421Case T-371/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – La Superquímica v EUIPO – Monta Klebebandwerk (Monta) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Monta – Earlier national figurative mark MONTACK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4422Case T-337/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Smart Kid v Commission (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to exchanges between the Commission and the Japanese authorities referring to the applicant’s product – Partial refusal of access – Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in the field of international relations – Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4423Case T-300/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Geos Atlas v EUCAP Somalia (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of security services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Selection criteria – Transparency – Equal treatment – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4424Case T-299/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – KHG v EUIPO – Panther Deutschland (Baltic Breeze) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Baltic Breeze – Earlier EU word mark HyBreeze – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4425Case T-288/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 –BVG v EUIPO (Sound of a melody) (EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a sound of a melody – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4426Case T-255/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Nouwen v Council (Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning the work of the Code of Conduct Group (Business Taxation) established by the Council – Partial refusal of access – Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 – Exceptions relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations and the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Union or of a Member State – General presumption of confidentiality – Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4427Case T-198/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – DM and DN v EUBAM Libya (Non-contractual liability – Common foreign and security policy – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – European Union Integrated Border Management Assistance Mission in Libya – Private security staff engaged by a third-party company for the protection of members of the mission – Causal link)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4428Cases T-191/24 to T-193/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Association pour la Promotion du Sel Artisanal and Others v Commission (Action for annulment – Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Registration of the name Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue – Trade association – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4429Case T-190/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Comptoir Sel Solaire v Commission (Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Opposition proceedings – Registration of the name Sel de Camargue/Fleur de sel de Camargue – Article 52(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Principle of sound administration)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4430Case T-86/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Vinatis v EUIPO – Vinites (VINATIS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4431Case T-58/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – TikTok Technology v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Commission decision determining the amount of the supervisory fee for 2023 – Article 43(3) to (5) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1127 – Method for calculating the number of average monthly active recipients – Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4432Case T-55/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Meta Platforms Ireland v Commission (Digital services – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Commission decision determining the amount of the supervisory fee for 2023 – Article 43(3) to (5) of Regulation 2022/2065 – Article 4(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1127 – Method for calculating the number of average monthly active recipients – Temporal adjustment of the effects of an annulment)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4433Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Patriotes.eu, anciennement Identité et Démocratie Parti (ID Parti) v Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations.#Law governing the institutions – Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations – Decision imposing a financial sanction on a political party – Article 27(2)(a)(vi) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1189/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4434Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 September 2025.#Patriotes.eu, anciennement Identité et Démocratie Parti (ID Parti) v Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations.#Law governing the institutions – Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations – Decision imposing a financial sanction on a political party – Article 27(2)(a)(vi) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1189/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4435Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Tigran Khudaverdyan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1116/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4436Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Tigran Khudaverdyan v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Error of assessment – Principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1116/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4437Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4438Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4439Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Syndicat de défense et de promotion des charcuteries corses AOP « Salameria de Corsica » v European Commission.#Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Registration of names ‘Pancetta de l’Île de Beauté/Panzetta de l’Île de Beauté’, ‘Saucisson sec de l’Île de Beauté/Salciccia de l’Île de Beauté’, ‘Bulagna de l’Île de Beauté’ and ‘Figatelli de l’Île de Beauté/Figatellu de l’Île de Beauté’ – Earlier protected designations of origin ‘Lonzo de Corse’/‘Lonzo de Corse – Lonzu’, ‘Jambon sec de Corse’/‘Jambon sec de Corse – Prisuttu’ and ‘Coppa de Corse’/‘Coppa de Corse – Coppa di Corsica’ – Eligibility of names – Evocation – Article 7(1)(a) and Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Equal treatment.#Case T-597/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.
4440Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Syndicat de défense et de promotion des charcuteries corses AOP « Salameria de Corsica » v European Commission.#Agriculture – Protected geographical indications – Registration of names ‘Pancetta de l’Île de Beauté/Panzetta de l’Île de Beauté’, ‘Saucisson sec de l’Île de Beauté/Salciccia de l’Île de Beauté’, ‘Bulagna de l’Île de Beauté’ and ‘Figatelli de l’Île de Beauté/Figatellu de l’Île de Beauté’ – Earlier protected designations of origin ‘Lonzo de Corse’/‘Lonzo de Corse – Lonzu’, ‘Jambon sec de Corse’/‘Jambon sec de Corse – Prisuttu’ and ‘Coppa de Corse’/‘Coppa de Corse – Coppa di Corsica’ – Eligibility of names – Evocation – Article 7(1)(a) and Article 13(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Equal treatment.#Case T-597/23.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2025 г.