4301Case C-609/25, Hanov: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Burgas (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 September 2025 – E.M. ** v A.M.A.cjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4302Case C-608/25, 1N Telecom: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 September 2025 – 1N Telecom GmbH v Verbraucherzentrale Nordrhein-Westfalen eVcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4303Case C-605/25, Energie-Control Austria II: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 12 September 2025 – ES v Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaftcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4304Case C-604/25, Energie-Control Austria I: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Austria) lodged on 12 September 2025 – FC v Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaftcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4305Case C-603/25 P: Appeal brought on 12 September 2025 by Gianfranco Emanuele and Dorte Hansen against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 2 July 2025 in Case T-228/24, Emanuele and Hansen v Parliamentcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4306Case T-315/24: Order of the General Court of 12 September 2025 – Landeshauptstadt München v EUIPO – Potter Clarkson (Oktoberfest) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity – No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 12 сентября 2025 г.
4307Case T-670/25, Elvada: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) made on 11 September 2025 – Elvada Company SRL v Ministerul Finanțelor – Autoritatea Vamală Românăcjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4308Case T-620/25: Action brought on 11 September 2025 – LJ and Others v Eulex Kosovocjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4309Case T-619/25: Action brought on 11 September 2025 – Nayara Energy Limited v Councilcjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4310Case T-618/25: Action brought on 11 September 2025 – Les Patriotes v Commissioncjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4311Case T-617/25: Action brought on 11 September 2025 – Ecole Normale Supérieure v Commission and EACEAcjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4312Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrated that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-248/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4313Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 11 septembre 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-248/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4314Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-247/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4315Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 11 septembre 2025.#ADS L. Kowalik, B. Włodarczyk s.c. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-247/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4316Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4317Ordonnance de la Cour du 11 septembre 2025.#Hecht Pharma GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-152/25 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4318Case C-602/25, Ithaque Sécurité: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 11 September 2025 – Ithaque Sécurité SAS v État belgecjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4319Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.
4320Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#RC v VertretungsNetz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – National procedure for appointing a representative for a person with a mental disability – Difficulty in finding an appropriate representative – Doubts as to the judicial nature of the procedure before the body making the reference.#Case C-406/24.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2025 г.