Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
41603

Case C-8/19 PPU: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019 — (request for a preliminary ruling from theSpetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against RH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 4 — Public references to guilt — Pre-trial detention decision — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of that decision — Observance of the presumption of innocence — Article 267 TFEU — Article 47, second paragraph, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of theEuropean Union — Right to have a case heard within a reasonable time. — National legislation restricting the powers of the national courts to make a request to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling or obliging them to adjudicate without waiting for the answer to that request — Disciplinary sanctions for failure to comply with that legislation)

cjeu_case ·
41607

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 février 2019.#TC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Article 12 – Maintien de la personne en détention – Article 17 – Délais pour l’adoption de la décision d’exécution du mandat d’arrêt européen – Législation nationale prévoyant la suspension d’office de la mesure de détention 90 jours après l’arrestation – Interprétation conforme – Suspension des délais – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 6 – Droit à la liberté et à la sûreté – Interprétations divergentes de la législation nationale – Clarté et prévisibilité.#Affaire C-492/18 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
41608

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.#TC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability.#Case C-492/18 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
41609

Case C-492/18 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of the European arrest warrant issued in respect of TC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Article 12 — Keeping a person in detention — Article 17 — Time limits for adoption of the decision to execute the European arrest warrant — National legislation providing for automatic suspension of detention 90 days after arrest — Interpretation in conformity with EU law — Suspension of time limits — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 6 — Right to liberty and security — Differing interpretations of national legislation — Clarity and predictability)

cjeu_case ·
41611

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2019.#Printeos, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Judgment partially annulling the decision — Reimbursement of the principal amount of the fine — Default interest — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Damage — Article 266 TFEU — Second sentence of Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.#Case T-201/17.

cjeu_case ·
41612

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2019.#Printeos, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Judgment partially annulling the decision — Reimbursement of the principal amount of the fine — Default interest — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Damage — Article 266 TFEU — Second sentence of Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.#Case T-201/17.

cjeu_case ·
41613

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 February 2019.#Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid — Refusal of access — Lis alibi pendens — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Obligation to conduct a specific and individual examination — Overriding public interest.#Case T-134/17.

cjeu_case ·
41615

Case T-201/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Printeos v Commission [Non-contractual liability — Competition — Cartels — Decision finding infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Judgment annulling the decision in part — Reimbursement of the principal amount of the fine — Default interest — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Causal link — Harm — Article 266 TFEU — Article 90(4)(a), second sentence, of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012]

cjeu_case ·
41616

Case T-134/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2019 — Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission [Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a procedure for reviewing State aid — Refusal of access — Lis alibi pendens — Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — Exception relating to protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Obligation to conduct a specific and individual examination — Overriding public interest]

cjeu_case ·
41617

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 12 February 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v L.W. Geelen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 9(2)(c) and (e) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 52(a) — Article 56(1)(k) — Supply of services — Place of taxable transactions — Reference for tax purposes — Live interactive erotic webcam sessions — Entertainment activity — Definition — Place where the services are physically carried out.#Case C-568/17.

cjeu_case ·