Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
41581

Case T-429/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2019 — BRF and SHB Comercio e Industria de Alimentos v Commission (Application for interim measures — Public health — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/700 — Amendment of the lists of third-country establishments from which imports of specified products of animal origin are permitted, regarding certain establishments in Brazil — No urgency — Weighing-up of competing interests)

cjeu_case ·
41584

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2019.#Ronny Rohart v Federale Pensioendienst.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Pension rights under the national pension scheme for employed persons — Refusal to take into account the period of compulsory military service completed by an official of the European Union after taking up his post — Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-179/18.

cjeu_case ·
41585

Case C-179/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Gent — Belgium) — Ronny Rohart v Federale Pensioendienst (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Pension rights under the national pension scheme for employed persons — Refusal to take into account the period of compulsory military service completed by an official of the European Union after taking up his post — Principle of sincere cooperation)

cjeu_case ·
41586

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 February 2019.#Etnia Dreams, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Etnik — Earlier EU trade mark — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to identify the earlier trade mark in the notice of opposition — Principle of sound administration — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-823/17.

cjeu_case ·
41587

Case T-823/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 February 2019 — Etnia Dreams v EUIPO — Poisson (Etnik) [EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Etnik — Earlier EU trade mark — Relative ground for refusal — Failure to identify the earlier trade mark in the notice of opposition — Principle of sound administration — Right to an effective remedy — Equality of arms — Principle of good faith — Legitimate expectations]

cjeu_case ·
41588

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 13 février 2019.#Human Operator Zrt. contre Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Harmonisation des législations fiscales – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Déduction de la TVA – Détermination de l’assujetti redevable de la TVA – Application rétroactive d’une mesure dérogatoire – Principe de sécurité juridique.#Affaire C-434/17.

cjeu_case ·
41589

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2019.#Human Operator Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of VAT — Determination of the taxable person liable for VAT — Retroactive application of a derogating measure — Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-434/17.

cjeu_case ·
41591

C-434/17: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Human Operator Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Deduction of VAT — Determination of the taxable person liable for VAT — Retroactive application of a derogating measure — Principle of legal certainty)

cjeu_case ·
41597

Ordonnance de la Cour (première chambre) du 12 février 2019.#Procédure pénale contre RH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Article 4 – Références publiques à la culpabilité – Décision de détention provisoire – Voies de recours – Procédure de contrôle de la légalité de cette décision – Respect de la présomption d’innocence – Article 267 TFUE – Article 47, deuxième alinéa, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit d’être entendu dans un délai raisonnable – Réglementation nationale restreignant la faculté des juridictions nationales de saisir la Cour d’une demande de décision préjudicielle ou les obligeant à statuer sans attendre la réponse à cette demande – Sanctions disciplinaires en cas de non-respect de cette réglementation.#Affaire C-8/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
41598

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 February 2019.#Criminal proceedings against RH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 4 — Public references to guilt — Pre-trial detention decision — Remedies — Procedure for reviewing the lawfulness of that decision — Observance of the presumption of innocence — Article 267 TFEU — Article 47, second paragraph, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to have a case heard within a reasonable time. — National legislation restricting the powers of the national courts to make a request to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling or obliging them to adjudicate without waiting for the answer to that request — Disciplinary sanctions for failure to comply with that legislation.#Case C-8/19 PPU.

cjeu_case ·