4121Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 25 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4122Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 25 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4123Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 25 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4124Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 25 September 2025.###cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4125Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 September 2025.#HJ v Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Article 288 TFEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Court of a Member State seised before the end of the transition period provided for in that agreement – Application by the courts of the forum of the law of another State – United Kingdom legislation transposing a directive – Directive 2006/54/EC – Applicability of EU law – Principle of mutual trust – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law.#Case C-350/24.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4126Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#KS and KD v Council of the European Union and Others.#Actions for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Damage resulting from the alleged infringement of fundamental rights – Serious offences committed in Kosovo in 1999 – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Failure to meet formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Non-attributability of the alleged omissions – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-771/20 RENV.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4127Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 September 2025.#KS and KD v Council of the European Union and Others.#Actions for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Damage resulting from the alleged infringement of fundamental rights – Serious offences committed in Kosovo in 1999 – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Failure to meet formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Non-attributability of the alleged omissions – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-771/20 RENV.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4128Case T-771/20 RENV: Order of the General Court of 25 September 2025 – KS and KD v Council and Others (Actions for damages – Common foreign and security policy – Damage resulting from the alleged infringement of fundamental rights – Serious offences committed in Kosovo in 1999 – European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (Eulex Kosovo) – Failure to meet formal requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility in part – Non-attributability of the alleged omissions – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2025 г.
4129Case T-702/25, Metsä Board Sverige: Request for a preliminary ruling from Nacka tingsrätt – Mark- och miljödomstolen (Sweden) made on 24 September 2025 – Metsä Board Sverige AB v Naturvårdsverketcjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4130Case T-701/25, Fischölimporteur: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made on 24 September 2025 – A v Hauptzollamt Ccjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4131Case T-658/25: Action brought on 24 September 2025 – Vitromed Healthcare v EUIPO – Vitromed (IVF LABWARE A VITROMED BRAND)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4132Case T-657/25: Action brought on 24 September 2025 – Mowi Poland v EFSAcjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4133Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Quality First GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark CRAVE NO MORE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-33/25.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4134Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Quality First GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark CRAVE NO MORE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-33/25.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4135Case T-33/25: Judgment of the General Court of 24 September 2025 – Quality First v EUIPO (CRAVE NO MORE) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark CRAVE NO MORE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4136Case C-629/25, Raiger: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Leoben (Austria) lodged on 24 September 2025 – A v Vcjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4137Removal from the register: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Questura di Roma v JD and Others (Joined Cases C-88/25 to C-113/25, Gaspaschi and Others)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4138Removal from the register: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 24 September 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Roma – Italy) – Questura di Roma v EJ and Others (Joined Cases C-80/25 to C-87/25, Varpigo and Others)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4139Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.
4140Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2025 г.