41321Case C-505/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Groupe Léa Nature v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Debonair Trading Internacional Lda (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SO’BiO ētic’ — EU and national word and figurative marks containing the word element ‘SO…?’ — Opposition by the proprietor — Refusal of registration)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41322Case C-388/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Konkurrensverket v SJ AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement procedures in the transport sector — Directive 2004/17/EC — Scope — Article 5 — Activities relating to the provision or operation of networks to provide a service to the public in the field of transport by railways — Award, by a public national railway undertaking providing transport services, of cleaning service contracts for trains belonging to that undertaking — No prior publication)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41323Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Souruh SA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-440/16.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41324Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-415/16.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41325Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality.#Case T-414/16.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41326Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Ateknea Solutions Catalonia, SA v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Contracts concluded within the sixth framework programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) — Reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant plus default interest — Eligible costs — Contractual liability.#Case T-69/16.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41327Case T-440/16: Judgment of the General Court 28 February 2019 — Souruh v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41328Case T-415/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41329Case T-414/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Drex Technologies v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Duty to state reasons — Error of assessment — Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation — Right to property — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41330Case T-69/16: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Ateknea Solutions Catalonia v Commission (Arbitration clause — Contracts concluded within the sixth framework programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) — Reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant plus default interest — Eligible costs — Contractual liability)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41331Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Conseil de l'Union européenne contre Marquis Energy LLC.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 157/2013 – Importations de bioéthanol originaire des États-Unis d’Amérique – Droit antidumping définitif – Marge de dumping établie à l’échelle nationale – Recours en annulation – Producteur non exportateur – Qualité pour agir – Affectation directe.#Affaire C-466/16 P.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41332Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Action for annulment – Non-exporting producer – Locus standi – Direct concern.#Case C-466/16 P.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41333Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Conseil de l'Union européenne contre Growth Energy et Renewable Fuels Association.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 157/2013 – Importations de bioéthanol originaire des États-Unis d’Amérique – Droit antidumping définitif – Marge de dumping établie à l’échelle nationale – Recours en annulation – Associations représentant des producteurs non exportateurs et des négociants/mélangeurs – Qualité pour agir – Affectation directe – Affectation individuelle.#Affaire C-465/16 P.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41334Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Council of the European Union v Growth Energy and Renewable Fuels Association.#Appeal – Dumping – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 – Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Country-wide dumping margin – Actions for annulment – Associations representing non-exporting producers and traders/blenders – Locus standi – Direct concern – Individual concern.#Case C-465/16 P.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41335Case C-466/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC, European Commission, ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Country-wide dumping margin — Actions for annulment — Non-exporting producer — Locus standi — Direct concern)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41336Case C-465/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Council of the European Union v Growth Energy, Renewable Fuels Association, European Commission, ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 — Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Country-wide dumping margin — Actions for annulment — Associations representing non-exporting producers and traders/blenders — Locus standi — Direct concern — Individual concern)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41337Case C-199/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 27 February 2019 — RL sp. z o.o., having its seat in Ł. v J.M.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2019 г.
41338Case C-196/19 P: Appeal brought on 27 February 2019 by UC against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 14 December 2018 in Case T-572/17, UC v Parliamentcjeu_case · 27 февраля 2019 г.
41339Case C-193/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö (Sweden) lodged on 27 February 2019 — A v Migrationsverketcjeu_case · 27 февраля 2019 г.
41340Case C-192/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 27 February 2019 — Rensen Shipbuilding BV, other party: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douanecjeu_case · 27 февраля 2019 г.