41301Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse contre Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Matière civile et commerciale – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Matières exclues – Sécurité sociale – Article 53 – Demande de délivrance du certificat attestant que la décision rendue par la juridiction d’origine est exécutoire – Jugement portant sur une créance constituée de suppléments pour l’indemnité de congés payés détenue par un organisme de sécurité sociale contre un employeur au titre du détachement de travailleurs – Exercice par la juridiction saisie d’une activité juridictionnelle.#Affaire C-579/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41302Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(2) — Matters excluded — Social security — Article 53 — Application for the issue of the certificate certifying that the judgment delivered by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment relating to a claim for wage supplements regarding annual leave pay that a social security body has against an employer with respect to the posting of workers — Exercise of a judicial function by the court ruling in the case.#Case C-579/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41303Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#« Bene Factum » UAB contre Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Dispositions fiscales – Droits d’accise – Directive 92/83/CEE – Article 27, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Exonérations – Notion de “produits non destinés à la consommation humaine” – Critères d’appréciation.#Affaire C-567/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41304Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#UAB „Bene Factum“ v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax provisions — Excise duty — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 27(1)(b) — Exemptions — Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ — Assessment criteria.#Case C-567/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41305Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Groupe Léa Nature v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SO’BiO ētic’ — EU and national word and figurative marks containing the word element ‘SO…?’ — Opposition by the proprietor — Refusal of registration.#Case C-505/17 P.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41306Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 28 février 2019.#Konkurrensverket contre SJ AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédures de passation des marchés dans les secteurs des transports – Directive 2004/17/CE – Champ d’application – Article 5 – Activités visant la mise à disposition ou l’exploitation de réseaux destinés à fournir un service au public dans le domaine du transport par chemin de fer – Attribution, par une entreprise ferroviaire nationale publique fournissant des services de transports, de contrats de services de nettoyage des trains appartenant à ladite société – Absence de publication préalable.#Affaire C-388/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41307Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 February 2019.#Konkurrensverket v SJ AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement procedures in the transport sector — Directive 2004/17/EC — Scope — Article 5 — Activities relating to the provision or operation of networks to provide a service to the public in the field of transport by railways — Award, by a public national railway undertaking providing transport services, of cleaning service contracts for trains belonging to that undertaking — No prior publication.#Case C-388/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41308Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 February 2019.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 258 TFEU — Article 49 TFEU — Directive 2006/123/EC — Article 15(2) and (3) — Directive 2005/36/EC — Articles 13, 14, 50 and Annex VII — Freedom of establishment — Recognition of professional qualifications — National rules on mediator training providers.#Case C-729/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41309Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 February 2019.#Lies Craeynest and Others v Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest and Brussels Instituut voor Milieubeheer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/50/EC — Articles 6, 7, 13 and 23 — Annex III — Assessment of air quality — Criteria for determining whether the nitrogen dioxide limit values have been exceeded — Measurements using fixed sampling points — Choice of appropriate sites — Interpretation of the values measured at the sampling points — Obligations of the Member States — Judicial review — Intensity of the review — Power to issue directions.#Case C-723/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41310Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 February 2019.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Natural gas processing installation — Sulphur recovery — ‘Claus process’ — Production of electricity in a secondary facility — Production of heat — Emission of inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) — Article 2(1) — Scope — Annex I — Activity of ‘combustion of fuels’ — Article 3(u) — Concept of ‘electricity generator’ — Article 10a(3) and (4) — Transitional arrangements for the harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Scope — Article 3(c) — Concept of ‘heat benchmark sub-installation’.#Case C-682/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41311Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 February 2019.#M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Additional Protocol — Article 59 — Decision No 3/80 — Social security for migrant workers — Waiver of residence clauses — Article 6 — Invalidity benefit — Withdrawal — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Residence condition — Directive 2003/109/EC — Long-term resident status.#Case C-677/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41312Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 28 February 2019.#WB v Notariusz Przemysława Bac.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Gorzowie Wielkopolskim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Article 3(1)(g) and (i) — Definition of a ‘decision’ in a matter of succession — Definition of an ‘authentic instrument’ in a matter of succession — Legal classification of the national deed of certification of succession — Article 3(2) — Definition of a ‘court’ — Failure by the Member State to notify the European Commission of notaries as non-judicial authorities exercising judicial functions like courts.#Case C-658/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41313Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 28 February 2019.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Amazon EU Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 6(1)(c) — Information requirements for distance and off‑premises contracts — Obligation, for a trader, to indicate its telephone number and its fax number ‘where they are available’ — Scope.#Case C-649/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41314Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 February 2019.#Proceedings brought by Eurobolt BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Right to an effective remedy — Extent of review by national courts of an act of the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Article 15(2) — Communication to the Member States, no later than 10 working days before the meeting of the Advisory Committee, of all relevant information — Concept of ‘relevant information’ — Essential procedural requirement — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 — Extension of the anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China to imports consigned from Malaysia — Validity.#Case C-644/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41315Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 February 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Tronex BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Article 2(1) — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 3(1) — Concepts of ‘shipment of waste’ and ‘waste’ — Consignment of goods initially intended for retail sale, returned by consumers or become redundant in the seller’s product range.#Case C-624/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41316Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 February 2019.#Baltic Media Alliance Ltd v Lietuvos radijo ir televizijos komisija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Directive 2010/13/EU — Audiovisual media services — Television broadcasting — Article 3(1) and (2) — Freedom of reception and retransmission — Incitement to hatred on grounds of nationality — Measures taken by the receiving Member State — Temporary obligation for media service providers and other persons providing services relating to the distribution of television channels or programmes via the internet to distribute or retransmit a television channel in the territory of that Member State only in pay-to-view packages.#Case C-622/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41317Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 February 2019.#Federazione Italiana Golf (FIG) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze and Federazione Italiana Sport Equestri (FISE) v Istituto Nazionale di Statistica - ISTAT and.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 – European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union – Paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Control by a National Olympic Committee of national sports federations in the form of non-profit institutions (NPIs) – Second sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘public intervention in the form of general regulations applicable to all units working in the same activity’ – Scope – First sentence of paragraph 20.15 of Annex A – Definition of ‘ability to determine the general policy or programme’ of an NPI – Scope – Paragraph 2.39(d), paragraph 20.15(d) and the last sentence of paragraph 20.309(i) of Annex A – Account taken of membership fees paid to the NPI.#Joined Cases C-612/17 and C-613/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41318Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 February 2019.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Services in the internal market — Directive 2006/123/EC — Article 15 — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Fees of architects and engineers for planning services — Minimum and maximum tariffs.#Case C-377/17.cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41319Case C-579/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien — Austria) — BUAK Bauarbeiter-Urlaubs- u. Abfertigungskasse v Gradbeništvo Korana d.o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(2) — Matters excluded — Social security — Article 53 — Application for the issue of the certificate certifying that the judgment delivered by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment relating to a claim for wage supplements regarding annual leave pay that a social security body has against an employer with respect to the posting of workers — Exercise of a judicial function by the court ruling in the case)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.
41320Case C-567/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Bene Factum’UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax provisions — Excise duty — Directive 92/83/EEC — Article 27(1)(b) — Exemptions — Definition of ‘products not for human consumption’ — Assessment criteria)cjeu_case · 28 февраля 2019 г.