40841Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Idi Srl v Arcadis - Agenzia Regionale Campana Difesa Suolo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 45(2), first subparagraph, point (b) – Personal situation of the candidate or tenderer – Possibility for the Member States to exclude from participation in a public contract any operator subject to a procedure for an arrangement with creditors – National legislation providing for the exclusion of persons subject to an ‘ongoing’ procedure for a declaration of admission to an arrangement with creditors, except where the insolvency plan provides for the continuation of the business – Operator having filed an application for an arrangement with creditors, reserving the possibility to submit a plan providing for the continuation of the business.#Case C-101/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40842Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Idi Srl v Arcadis - Agenzia Regionale Campana Difesa Suolo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Directive 2004/18/EC – Article 45(2), first subparagraph, point (b) – Personal situation of the candidate or tenderer – Possibility for the Member States to exclude from participation in a public contract any operator subject to a procedure for an arrangement with creditors – National legislation providing for the exclusion of persons subject to an ‘ongoing’ procedure for a declaration of admission to an arrangement with creditors, except where the insolvency plan provides for the continuation of the business – Operator having filed an application for an arrangement with creditors, reserving the possibility to submit a plan providing for the continuation of the business.#Case C-101/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40843Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 28 mars 2019.#Tallinna Vesi AS contre Keskkonnaamet.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Déchets – Directive 2008/98/CE – Réutilisation et valorisation des déchets – Critères spécifiques relatifs à la cessation du statut de déchet des boues d’épuration après traitement de valorisation – Absence de critères définis au niveau de l’Union européenne ou au niveau national.#Affaire C-60/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40844Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#AS Tallinna Vesi AS v Keskkonnaamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Directive 2008/98/EC — Re-use and recovery of waste — Specific end-of-waste criteria for sewage sludge which has undergone recovery treatment — No defined criteria at European Union or national level.#Case C-60/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40845Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 28 March 2019.#WESTbahn Management GmbH v ÖBB-Infrastruktur AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schienen-Control Kommission.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Single European Railway Area — Directive 2012/34/EU — Article 3 — Concept of ‘railway infrastructure’ — Annex II — Minimum access — Inclusion of the use of passenger platforms.#Case C-210/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40846Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 28 March 2019.#Proceedings brought by Wasserleitungsverband Nördliches Burgenland and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Objective of reducing pollution — Waters affected by pollution — Maximum nitrate level of 50 mg/l — Action programmes adopted by the Member States — Rights of individuals to have such a programme amended — Locus standi before the national authorities and courts.#Case C-197/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40847Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 March 2019.#AMS Neve Ltd and Others v Heritage Audio SL and Pedro Rodríguez Arribas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 97(5) — Jurisdiction — Infringement proceedings — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which ‘the act of infringement has been committed’ — Advertising and offers for sale displayed on a website and on social media platforms.#Case C-172/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40848Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 28 March 2019.#Safeway Ltd v Andrew Richard Newton and Safeway Pension Trustees Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Article 119 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 141 EC) — Male and female workers — Equal pay — Private occupational retirement pension scheme — Normal pension age differentiated by gender — Date of adoption of measures reinstating equal treatment — Retroactive equalisation of that age to the normal pension age of the persons previously disadvantaged.#Case C-171/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40849Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 March 2019.#HQ and Others v Aegean Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Flight cancellation — Assistance — Right to reimbursement of the cost of the air ticket by the air carrier — Article 8(2) — Package tour — Directive 90/314/EEC — Insolvency of the tour organiser.#Case C-163/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40850Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 28 March 2019.#Antonio Romano and Lidia Romano v DSL Bank – a branch of DB Privat- und Firmenkundenbank AG, formerly DSL Bank – ein Geschäftsbereich der Deutsche Postbank AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Bonn.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2002/65/EC – Distance consumer loan agreement – Right of withdrawal – Exercising the right of withdrawal after the contract has been performed in full at the consumer’s express request – Communication to the consumer of information regarding the right of withdrawal.#Case C-143/18.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40851Case C-275/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Milan Vinš v Odvolací finanční ředitelství (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 131 and Article 146(1)(a) — Exemption for supplies of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union — Condition of exemption laid down by national law — Placing of goods under a particular customs procedure — Proof of placing of goods under the export procedure)cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40852Case C-144/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 — River Kwai International Food Industry Co. Ltd v Association européenne des transformateurs de maïs doux (AETMD), Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Dumping — Definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain prepared or preserved sweetcorn in kernels originating in Thailand — Interim review pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40853Case C-101/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Idi Srl v Arcadis Agenzia Regionale Campana Difesa Suolo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 45(2), first subparagraph, point (b) — Personal situation of the candidate or tenderer — Possibility for the Member States to exclude from participation in a public contract any operator subject to a procedure for an arrangement with creditors — National legislation providing for the exclusion of persons subject to an ‘ongoing’ procedure for a declaration of admission to an arrangement with creditors, except where the insolvency plan provides for the continuation of the business — Operator having filed an application for an arrangement with creditors, reserving the possibility to submit a plan providing for the continuation of the business)cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40854Case C-60/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Ringkonnakohus — Estonia) — Tallinna Vesi AS v Keskkonnaamet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Waste — Directive 2008/98/EC — Re-use and recovery of waste — Specific end-of-waste criteria for sewage sludge which has undergone recovery treatment — No defined criteria at European Union or national level)cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40855Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#Coesia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two oblique red curves — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-829/17.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40856Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 March 2019.#dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALBÉA — Earlier international registration designating the European Union — Word mark Balea — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-562/17.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40857Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Robert Bosch GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Applications for the EU figurative marks Simply.Connected. — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 64 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40858Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 March 2019.#Robert Bosch GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Applications for the EU figurative marks Simply.Connected. — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 64 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 71 of Regulation 2017/1001).#Cases T-251/17 and T-252/17.cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40859Case T-829/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of two oblique red curves) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two oblique red curves — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Obligation to state reasons — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.
40860Case T-562/17: Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2019 — dm-drogerie markt v EUIPO — Albea Services (ALBÉA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark ALBÉA — Earlier international registration designating the European Union — Word mark Balea — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) ofRegulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 28 марта 2019 г.