40681Case C-289/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) lodged on 9 April 2019 — Dexia Nederland BV v Zcjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40682Case C-288/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Saarlandes (Germany) lodged on 9 April 2019 — QM v Finanzamt Saarbrückencjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40683Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#Zitro IP Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark PICK & WIN MULTISLOT — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-277/18.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40684Case T-277/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Zitro IP v EUIPO (PICK & WIN MULTISLOT) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark PICK & WIN MULTISLOT — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40685Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 9 April 2019.#Trace Sport v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane, kantoor Eindhoven.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Commercial policy – Anti-dumping duties – Imports of bicycles consigned from Indonesia, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Tunisia – Extension to those countries of the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of bicycles originating in China – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 501/2013 – Validity – Admissibility – No action for annulment brought by the applicant in the main proceedings – Associated importer – Standing to bring an action for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Article 13 – Circumvention – Article 18 – Non-cooperation – Proof – Body of evidence.#Case C-251/18.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40686Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#Qualcomm, Inc. and Qualcomm Europe, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition — Market for baseband chipsets used in consumer electronic devices — Administrative procedure — Article 18(3) and Article 24(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Decision requesting information — Obligation to state reasons — Necessity of the information requested — Proportionality — Burden of proof — Privilege against self-incrimination — Principle of good administration.#Case T-371/17.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40687Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#Adam Aldridge and Others v European Commission.#Civil service — Temporary staff — OLAF — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision of the Director of OLAF establishing a one-off reclassification to the next higher grade — Request for an annual reclassification procedure to be launched — Measure of a general nature — Time-limit for bringing an action — Point from which time stars to run — Publication on the intranet — Inadmissibility.#Case T-319/17.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40688Case T-371/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Qualcomm and Qualcomm Europe v Commission (Competition — Market for baseband chipsets used in consumer electronic devices — Administrative procedure — Article 18(3) and Article 24(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Decision requesting information — Obligation to state reasons — Necessity of the information requested — Proportionality — Burden of proof — Privilege against self-incrimination — Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40689Case T-319/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Aldridge and Others v Commission (Civil service — Temporary staff — OLAF — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision of the Director of OLAF establishing a one-off reclassification to the next higher grade — Request for an annual reclassification procedure to be launched — Measure of a general nature — Time-limit for bringing an action — Point from which time stars to run — Publication on the intranet — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40690Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#SA Close and Cegelec v European Parliament.#Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Construction of an energy unit — Extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Financial and economic capacity — Technical and professional capacity — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-259/15.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40691Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#Sopra Steria Group SA v European Parliament.#Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of IT services to the Parliament and other EU institutions and bodies — Exclusion from tendering procedures — Potential conflict of interests — Failure to provide information required by the contracting authority — Article 107(1)(b) of the Financial Regulation — Transparency — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Article 102(1) of the Financial Regulation.#Case T-182/15.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40692Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 April 2019.#Sopra Steria Group SA v European Parliament.#Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of IT services to the Parliament and other EU institutions and bodies — Exclusion from tendering procedures — Potential conflict of interests — Failure to provide information required by the contracting authority — Article 107(1)(b) of the Financial Regulation — Transparency — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Article 102(1) of the Financial Regulation.#Case T-182/15.cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40693Case T-259/15: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament (Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Construction of an energy unit — Extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Financial and economic capacity — Technical and professional capacity — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40694Case T-182/15: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Sopra Steria Group v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Supply of IT services to the Parliament and other EU institutions and bodies — Exclusion from tendering procedures — Potential conflict of interests — Failure to provide information required by the contracting authority — Article 107(1)(b) of the Financial Regulation — Transparency — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Article 102(1) of the Financial Regulation)cjeu_case · 9 апреля 2019 г.
40696Case T-236/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — Le Comité de Douzelage de Houffalize v Commission and the EACEAcjeu_case · 8 апреля 2019 г.
40697Case T-232/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — H&R Ölwerke Schindler v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 апреля 2019 г.
40698Case T-231/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — Klöckner Pentaplast v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 апреля 2019 г.
40699Case T-229/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — AlzChem Trostberg v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 апреля 2019 г.
40700Case T-223/19: Action brought on 8 April 2019 — Clariant Produkte (Deutschland) v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 апреля 2019 г.