40561Case T-477/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Užstato sistemos administratorius v EUIPO — DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem (Representation of a bottle with an arrow) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a bottle and an arrow — Earlier EU figurative mark representing a can, a bottle and an arrow — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40562Case T-403/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Pharmadom v EUIPO — Objectif Pharma (WS wellpharma shop) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark WS wellpharma shop — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40563Case T-323/18: Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2019 — Fomanu v EUIPO — Fujifilm Imaging GermanyReresentation of a butterfly) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a butterfly — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40564Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public supply contracts — Action for annulment — Concept of a ‘purely confirmatory measure’ — Manifest error of assessment — Distortion of the facts.#Case C-794/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40565Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Pracsis SPRL and Conceptexpo Project v European Commission and Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Public supply contracts — Action for annulment — Concept of a ‘purely confirmatory measure’ — Manifest error of assessment — Distortion of the facts.#Case C-794/18 P.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40566Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#HJ v II.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 5.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Law applicable to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Hague Protocol — Insufficient statement of reasons which led the referring court to have doubts as to the interpretation of EU law — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-680/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40567Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 — European Enforcement Order — Notaries acting in enforcement proceedings based on an authentic document — Ex parte proceedings — Article 18 TFEU — Reverse discrimination — Lack of connection to EU law — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-657/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40568Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#OD v Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Gerona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Determination of the court having jurisdiction to hear an application for compensation in respect of a delayed flight — Article 26 — Implied prorogation — Requirement that the defendant enter an appearance.#Case C-646/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40569Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#Vanessa Gambietz contre Erika Ziegler.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droit des entreprises – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Directive 2011/7/UE – Article 6 – Indemnisation pour les frais de recouvrement – Paiement d’un montant forfaitaire et d’une indemnisation raisonnable – Déduction du montant forfaitaire des dépenses engagées pour faire appel à un avocat avant de saisir un tribunal.#Affaire C-131/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40570Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Vanessa Gambietz v Erika Ziegler.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Law on undertakings — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Directive 2011/7/EU — Article 6 — Compensation for recovery costs — Payment of a fixed sum and of reasonable compensation — Deduction of fixed sum from the costs of instructing a lawyer prior to bringing proceedings before a court.#Case C-131/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40571Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#ZX contre Ryanair DAC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Détermination de la juridiction compétente pour connaître d’une demande d’indemnisation pour un vol retardé – Article 7, point 5 – Exploitation d’une succursale – Article 26 – Prorogation tacite – Nécessité pour le défendeur de comparaître.#Affaire C-464/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40572Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#ZX v Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 1 de Gerona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Determination of the court having jurisdiction to hear an application for compensation in respect of a delayed flight — Article 7(5) — Operations of a branch — Article 26 — Implied prorogation — Requirement that the defendant enter an appearance.#Case C-464/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40573Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) – Agentes de Navegação S.A. contre Banco Comercial Português SA et Caixa Geral de Depósitos SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Services de paiement dans le marché intérieur – Directive 2007/64/CE – Articles 2 et 58 – Champ d’application – Utilisateur de services de paiement – Notion – Exécution d’un ordre de prélèvement émis par un tiers relatif à un compte dont il n’est pas le titulaire – Absence d’autorisation du titulaire du compte débité – Opération de paiement non autorisée.#Affaire C-295/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40574Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Mediterranean Shipping Company (Portugal) - Agentes de Navegação SA v Banco Comercial Português SA and Caixa Geral de Depósitos, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 2 and 58 — Scope — Payment service user — Meaning — Execution of a direct-debit payment order issued by a third party in respect of an account of which that party is not the holder — No authorisation from the holder of the debited account — Unauthorised payment transactions.#Case C-295/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40575Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#X BV contre Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Tarif douanier commun – Classement des marchandises – Nomenclature combinée – Sous-positions 8528 51 00 et 8528 59 40 – Moniteurs à écran plat à cristaux liquides pouvant afficher des signaux provenant de systèmes automatiques de traitement de l’information – Accord sur le commerce des produits des technologies de l’information.#Affaire C-288/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40576Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Customs Tariff – Classification of goods – Combined Nomenclature – Subheadings 8528 51 00 and 8528 59 40 – LCD flat panel monitors capable of displaying signals from automatic data-processing systems – Agreement on trade in information technology products.#Case C-288/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40577Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#Syndicat des cadres de la sécurité intérieure contre Premier ministre e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2003/88/CE – Aménagement du temps de travail – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Durée maximale hebdomadaire de travail – Période de référence – Caractère glissant ou fixe – Dérogation – Fonctionnaires de police.#Affaire C-254/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40578Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Syndicat des cadres de la sécurité intérieure v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/88/EC — Organisation of working time — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Maximum weekly working time — Reference period — Rolling or fixed nature — Derogation — Police officers.#Case C-254/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40579Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 11 avril 2019.#Cobra Servicios Auxiliares SA contre José David Sánchez Iglesias e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4 – Principe de non-discrimination – Notion de “conditions d’emploi” – Comparabilité des situations – Justification – Notion de “raisons objectives” – Indemnité en cas de résiliation d’un contrat de travail à durée indéterminée pour un motif objectif – Indemnité moindre versée à l’échéance d’un contrat de travail “pour tâche occasionnelle”.#Affaires jointes C-29/18, C-30/18 et C-44/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.
40580Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2019.#Cobra Servicios Auxiliares SA v José David Sánchez Iglesias and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Concept of ‘employment conditions’ — Comparable situations — Justification — Concept of ‘objective grounds’ — Compensation in the event of termination of an employment contract of indefinite duration on an objective ground — Lesser amount of compensation paid on expiry of an employment contract ‘for a specific task or service’.#Joined Cases C-29/18, C-30/18 and C-44/18.cjeu_case · 11 апреля 2019 г.