40381Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 2 May 2019.#European Commission v Icap Management Services Ltd and Icap New Zealand Ltd.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Japanese yen interest rate derivatives sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Liability of an undertaking for its role as facilitator of the cartel — Calculation of the fine — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-39/18 P.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40382Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 2 May 2019.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Deutsche Bahn AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro — Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 — Single euro payments area (SEPA) — Payment by direct debit — Article 9(2) — Accessibility of payments — Residence condition.#Case C-28/18.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40383Case C-309/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Lavorgna Srl v Comune di Montelanico, Comune di Supino, Comune di Sgurgola, Comune di Trivigliano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Labour costs — Automatic exclusion of a tenderer who has failed to state those costs separately in the tender — Principle of proportionality)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40384Case C-294/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the markkinaoikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by Oulun Sähkönmyynti Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Energy efficiency — Directive 2012/27/EU — Article 11(1) — Cost of access to metering and billing information — Right of final customers to receive all their bills and billing information relating to their energy consumption free of charge — Electricity network charges — Discount on electricity network charges granted by an electricity retail sales company to customers who have chosen electronic billing)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40385Case C-268/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău — Romania) — SC Onlineshop SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Direcția Generală a Vămilor (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined nomenclature — Subheadings 85269120 and 85285900 — GPS navigation system with multiple functions)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40386Case C-265/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Common System of Value Added Tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Special scheme for small enterprises — Articles 282 to 292 — VAT exemption for small enterprises whose annual turnover is below the fixed threshold — Simultaneous supply of two immovable properties in a single transaction — Annual turnover limit exceeded in view of the sale price of one of the two properties — Obligation to pay tax on the total value of the transaction)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40387Case C-259/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 3 de Madrid — Spain) — Sociedad Estatal Correos y Telégrafos SA v Asendia Spain SLU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 97/67/EC — Common rules for the development of the internal market in postal services — Provision of the universal postal service — Exclusive rights of the designated operator — Issue of means of payment for postage other than postage stamps)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40388Case C-250/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Croatia (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/98/EC — Waste treatment — Article 5(1) — Stone aggregate which does not fall within the concept of a ‘by-product’ — Article 13 — Obligation of Member States to ensure protection of human health and of the environment — Article 15(1) — Obligation to have waste treated by the holder or other designated persons)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40389Case C-225/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Grupa Lotos S.A. v Minister Finansów (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Deduction of input tax — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2) and (6) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168 and 176 — Exclusion from the right to deduct — Purchase of overnight accommodation and catering services — Standstill clause — Accession to the European Union)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40390Case C-224/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Budimex S.A. v Minister Finansów (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 66 — Chargeable event and chargeability of the tax — Time of the supply of the services — Construction and installation work — Taking into account the time of the acceptance of the work stipulated in the contract for the supply of services)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40391Case C-133/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal administratif de Montreuil — France) — Sea Chefs Cruise Services GmbH v Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Refund of VAT — Directive 2008/9/EC — Article 20 — Request for additional information from the Member State of refund — Information to be provided within one month of the date on which the request reaches the person to whom it is addressed — Legal nature of time limit and consequences of failure to comply)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40392Case C-98/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — T. Boer & Zonen BV v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of health — Hygiene package — Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 — Hygiene of food of animal origin — Rules for food business operators — Specific requirements — Meat of domestic ungulates — Storage and transport — Requirements for the temperature of the meat)cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40393Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV OST.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40394Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#GX v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure — No failure to adjudicate on the application for revision.#Case C-233/17 P-REV-.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40395Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 2 mai 2019.#Pillar Securitisation Sàrl contre Hildur Arnadottir.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Convention de Lugano II – Article 15 – Contrat conclu par un consommateur – Lien avec la directive 2008/48/CE – Contrat de crédit à la consommation – Articles 2 et 3 – Notions de “consommateur” et de “transactions auxquelles s’applique la directive” – Montant maximal du crédit – Absence de pertinence au regard de l’article 15 de la convention de Lugano II.#Affaire C-694/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40396Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#Pillar Securitisation Sàrl v Hildur Arnadottir.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Luxembourg).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Lugano II Convention — Article 15 — Contract concluded by a consumer — Relationship with Directive 2008/48/EC — Consumer credit agreements — Articles 2 and 3 — Concepts of ‘consumer’ and of ‘transactions covered by the directive’ — Maximum amount of credit — Irrelevant for the purposes of Article 15 of the Lugano II Convention.#Case C-694/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40397Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 mai 2019.#Fundación Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida Queso Manchego contre Industrial Quesera Cuquerella SL et Juan Ramón Cuquerella Montagud.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Règlement (CE) no 510/2006 – Article 13, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Protection des indications géographiques et des appellations d’origine des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires – Fromage manchego (“queso manchego”) – Utilisation de signes pouvant évoquer la région à laquelle est liée l’appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) – Notion de “consommateur moyen normalement informé et raisonnablement attentif et avisé” – Consommateurs européens ou consommateurs de l’État membre où le produit visé par l’AOP est fabriqué et majoritairement consommé.#Affaire C-614/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40398Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#Fundación Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida Queso Manchego v Industrial Quesera Cuquerella SL and Juan Ramón Cuquerella Montagud.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 — Article 13(1)(b) — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Manchego cheese (‘queso manchego’) — Use of signs capable of evoking the region with which a protected designation of origin (PDO) is associated — Concept of the ‘average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect’ — European consumers or consumers of the Member State in which the product covered by the PDO is made and mainly consumed.#Case C-614/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40399Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 2 mai 2019.#A-Fonds contre Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides existantes et aides nouvelles – Notion d’aide nouvelle – Remboursement d’un impôt sur les dividendes – Régime élargi aux sociétés établies en dehors du territoire de l’État membre concerné – Libre circulation des capitaux – Obligations des juridictions nationales.#Affaire C-598/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.
40400Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#A-Fonds v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Existing aid and new aid — Concept of new aid — Refund of dividend tax — Scheme widened to companies established outside the Member State concerned — Free movement of capital — Obligations of national courts.#Case C-598/17.cjeu_case · 2 мая 2019 г.