40301Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#Fissler GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark vita — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Concept of characteristic — Name of a colour — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40302Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#Fissler GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark vita — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Concept of characteristic — Name of a colour — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40303Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#WP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contracts — Decision not to renew — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Equal treatment — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint.#Case T-407/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40304Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#Sona Nutrition Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for EU figurative marks SOLGAR Since 1947 MultiPlus WHOLEFOOD CONCENTRATE MULTIVITAMIN FORMULA — Earlier national word mark MULTIPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-152/18 to T-155/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40305Case T-419/18: Order of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Crédit agricole and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v Commissioncjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40306Case T-629/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — mobile.de v EUIPO (Representation of a car in a speech bubble) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a car in a speech bubble — Admissibility of the action before the Board of Appeal — Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Restriction of the list of goods or services covered by the mark applied for — Article 27(5) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 — Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal — Obligation to adjudicate on a request for restriction)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40307Case T-423/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Fissler v EUIPO (vita) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark vita — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Descriptiveness — Concept of characteristic — Name of a colour — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40308Case T-407/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — WP v EUIPO (Civil service — Temporary staff — Fixed-term contracts — Decision not to renew — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Equal treatment — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40309Cases T-152/18 to T-155/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Sona Nutrition v EUIPO — Solgar Holdings (SOLGAR Since 1947 MultiPlus WHOLEFOOD CONCENTRATE MULTIVITAMIN FORMULA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU figurative marks SOLGAR Since 1947 MultiPlus WHOLEFOOD CONCENTRATE MULTIVITAMIN FORMULA — Earlier national word mark MULTIPLUS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40310Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 7 May 2019.#Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 53 — Certificate relating to a judgment in civil and commercial matters in Annex I — Powers of the court of origin — Automatic verification whether there have been breaches of the rules on jurisdiction concerning consumer contracts.#Case C-347/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40311Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 7 May 2019.#Proceedings brought by Kauno miesto savivaldybė and Kauno miesto savivaldybės administracija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 12(1) — Temporal application — Freedom of the Member States as to choice of how services are provided — Limits — Public contracts subject to so-called ‘in house’ awards — In-house transaction — Overlapping of a public contract and an in-house transaction).#Case C-285/18.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40312Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2019 (Extracts).#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Germany – Flat-rate financial correction applied due to insufficient frequency of key controls – Obligation to calculate interest and record it in the accounts annually – Articles 31 and 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 – Article 6(h) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-239/17.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40313Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 May 2019 (Extracts).#Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Expenditure incurred by Germany – Flat-rate financial correction applied due to insufficient frequency of key controls – Obligation to calculate interest and record it in the accounts annually – Articles 31 and 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 – Article 6(h) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-239/17.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40314Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Financial corrections — Meaning of ‘producer’ — Investments made outside the premises of a producer organisation — Checks carried out before the approval of an operational programme — Check carried out in the authorisation of expenditure — Single financial correction — Flat-rate financial correction — Proportionality — Duty to state reasons.#Case T-49/17.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40315Case T-239/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Germany v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Germany — Flat-rate financial correction applied due to insufficient frequency of key controls — Obligation to calculate interest and record it in the accounts annually — Articles 31 and 32 of Regulation (EC)No 1290/2005 — Article 6(h) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40316Case T-49/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 May 2019 — Spain v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Financial corrections — Meaning of ‘producer’ — Investments made outside the premises of a producer organisation — Checks carried out before the approval of an operational programme — Check carried out in the authorisation of expenditure — Single financial correction — Flat-rate financial correction — Proportionality — Duty to state reasons)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40317Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 7 mai 2019.#Monachos Eirinaios contre Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 98/5/CE – Accès à la profession d’avocat – Moine ayant acquis la qualification professionnelle d’avocat dans un État membre autre que l’État membre d’accueil – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Condition d’inscription auprès de l’autorité compétente de l’État membre d’accueil – Attestation d’inscription auprès de l’autorité compétente de l’État membre d’origine – Refus d’inscription – Règles professionnelles et déontologiques – Incompatibilité de la qualité de moine avec l’exercice de la profession d’avocat.#Affaire C-431/17.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40318Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2019.#Monachos Eirinaios, kata kosmon Antonios Giakoumakis tou Emmanouil v Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 98/5/EC — Access to the profession of lawyer — Monk who has obtained the professional qualification of lawyer in a Member State other than the host Member State — Article 3(2) — Condition requiring registration with the competent authority of the host Member State — Certificate attesting to registration with the competent authority of the home Member State — Refusal to register — Rules of professional conduct — Incompatibility of the status of monk with practice of the profession of lawyer.#Case C-431/17.cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.
40319Case C-431/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 7 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Monachos Eirinaios, kata kosmon Antonios Giakoumakis tou Emmanouil v Dikigorikos Syllogos Athinon (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 98/5/EC — Access to the profession of lawyer — Monk who has obtained the professional qualification of lawyer in a Member State other than the host Member State — Article 3(2) — Condition requiring registration with the competent authority of the host Member State — Certificate attesting to registration with the competent authority of the home Member State — Refusal to register — Rules of professional conduct — Incompatibility of the status of monk with practice of the profession of lawyer)cjeu_case · 7 мая 2019 г.