Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
40006

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#Cuervo y Sobrinos 1882, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — European Union trade mark including the word elements Cuervo y Sobrinos LA HABANA 1882 — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Assessment by the General Court of the similarities between the signs at issue — Assessment of a factual nature — Obligation to state reasons — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-780/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
40007

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 mai 2019.#Krohn & Schröder GmbH contre Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Article 212 bis – Procédures d’importation – Dette douanière – Exonération – Dumping – Subventions – Importations de modules photovoltaïques en silicium cristallin et de leurs composants essentiels (cellules) originaires ou en provenance de la République populaire de Chine – Règlements d’exécution (UE) no 1238/2013 et (UE) no 1239/2013 instituant un droit antidumping et un droit compensateur – Exonérations.#Affaire C-226/18.

cjeu_case ·
40008

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#Krohn & Schröder GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 212a — Import procedures — Customs debt — Exemption — Dumping — Subsidies — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China — Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and (EU) No 1239/2013 imposing an anti-dumping duty and a countervailing duty — Exemptions.#Case C-226/18.

cjeu_case ·
40009

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 22 May 2019.#Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA „Altic”.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Procurement of food products — Deduction of input tax — Refusal of deduction — Possibly fictitious supplier — VAT fraud — Requirements relating to knowledge on the part of the purchaser — Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 — Obligations of traceability of foodstuffs and identification of the supplier — Regulations (CE) No 852/2004 and (EC) No 882/2004 — Registration obligations of operators in the food sector — Effect on the right to deduct VAT.#Case C-329/18.

cjeu_case ·
40010

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 22 May 2019.#GRDF SA v Eni Gas & Power France SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common rules for the internal market in natural gas — Directive 2009/73/EC — Article 41(11) — Settlement of disputes concerning the obligations imposed on a system operator — Temporal effects of decisions of the dispute settlement authority — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case C-236/18.

cjeu_case ·
40011

Case C-226/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Krohn & Schröder GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 212a — Import procedures — Customs debt — Exemption — Dumping — Subsidies — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China — Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1238/2013 and (EU) No 1239/2013 imposing an anti-dumping duty and a countervailing duty — Exemptions)

cjeu_case ·
40012

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2019 (Extracts).#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark CMS Italy — Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left — Relative grounds for refusal — Reputation of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence of reputation — Previous decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier marks — Taking account of those decisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration.#Case T-161/16.

cjeu_case ·
40013

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 May 2019 (Extracts).#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark CMS Italy — Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left — Relative grounds for refusal — Reputation of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence of reputation — Previous decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier marks — Taking account of those decisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration.#Case T-161/16.

cjeu_case ·
40014

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol v European Commission.#State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to a professional football club — Settlement aimed at compensating for a failure to carry out a land transfer initially agreed between a city council and a football club — Football club overcompensated — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Advantage.#Case T-791/16.

cjeu_case ·
40015

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#Real Madrid Club de Fútbol v European Commission.#State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to a professional football club — Settlement aimed at compensating for a failure to carry out a land transfer initially agreed between a city council and a football club — Football club overcompensated — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Advantage.#Case T-791/16.

cjeu_case ·
40016

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#Andrea Incontri Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ANDREA INCONTRI — Earlier EU word mark ANDREIA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character of a first name and a surname — Power to alter decisions.#Case T-197/16.

cjeu_case ·
40017

Case T-161/16: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — CMS (CMS Italy) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark CMS Italy — Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left — Relative grounds for refusal — Reputation of the earlier marks — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence of reputation — Previous decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier marks — Taking account of those decisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of sound administration)

cjeu_case ·
40019

Case T-197/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Andrea Incontri v EUIPO — Higicol (ANDREA INCONTRI) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the European Union word mark ANDREA INCONTRI — Earlier European Union word mark ANDREIA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Distinctive character of a first name and a surname — Power to alter decisions)

cjeu_case ·
40020

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Commission’s Validation Panel on qualification as a micro, small and medium-sized business — Request for review under sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 of the Annex to Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — No administrative appeal within the meaning of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Res judicata — Criteria for the definition of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in EU policies — Concept of an ‘enterprise’ — Concept of an ‘economic activity’ — Criterion of independence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-604/15.

cjeu_case ·