Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
39803

Case T-221/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista v EUIPO — Battista Nino Caffè (BATTISTINO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark BATTISTINO — Earlier EU word mark BATTISTA — Declaration of invalidity — Proof of genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
39804

Case T-220/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Torrefazione Caffè Michele Battista v EUIPO — Battista Nino Caffè (Battistino) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Battistino — Earlier EU word mark BATTISTA — Declaration of partial invalidity — Proof of genuine use of the earlier trade mark — Article 57(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
39807

Case T-192/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Rietze v EUIPO — Volkswagen (Motor vehicle VW Caddy) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Registered Community design representing the motor vehicle VW Caddy — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity — Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design)

cjeu_case ·
39808

Case T-191/18: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2019 — Rietze v EUIPO — Volkswagen (Motor vehicle VW Caddy Maxi) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing the motor vehicle VW Caddy Maxi — Earlier Community design — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity — Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design)

cjeu_case ·
39810

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Inge Barnett v European Economic and Social Committee.#Appeal — Civil service — Official — Retirement pension — Early retirement without reduction of pension rights — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 9(2) of Annex VIII — General implementing provisions — Interests of the service — Decision adopted to comply with a judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal — Article 266 TFEU — Res judicata.#Case C-503/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
39811

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 juin 2019.#Ágnes Weil contre Géza Gulácsi.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Champ d’application ratione temporis – Règlement (CE) no 44/2001 – Champ d’application ratione materiae – Matière civile et commerciale – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 et paragraphe 2, sous a) – Matières exclues – Régimes matrimoniaux – Article 54 – Demande de délivrance du certificat attestant que la décision rendue par la juridiction d’origine est exécutoire – Décision judiciaire portant sur une créance résultant de la dissolution du régime patrimonial découlant d’une relation de partenariat de fait.#Affaire C-361/18.

cjeu_case ·
39812

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Ágnes Weil v Géza Gulácsi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szekszárdi Járásbíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 66 — Temporal scope — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Material scope — Civil and commercial matters — Article 1(1) and (2)(a) — Matters excluded — Rights in property arising out of a matrimonial relationship — Article 54 — Application for the certificate certifying that the judgment given by the court of origin is enforceable — Judgment given concerning a debt stemming from the settlement of rights in property arising out of an unregistered non-marital partnership.#Case C-361/18.

cjeu_case ·
39813

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 6 juin 2019.#P.M. e.a. contre Ministerraad.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédures de passation des marchés publics de travaux, de fournitures et de services – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 10, sous c), et sous d), i), ii) et v) – Validité – Champ d’application – Exclusion des services d’arbitrage et de conciliation et de certains services juridiques – Principes d’égalité de traitement et de subsidiarité – Articles 49 et 56 TFUE.#Affaire C-264/18.

cjeu_case ·
39814

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#P. M. and Others v Ministerraad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10, (c), and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) — Validity — Scope — Exclusion of arbitration and conciliation services and of certain legal services — Principles of equal treatment and subsidiarity — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU.#Case C-264/18.

cjeu_case ·
39817

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 6 juin 2019.#Michel Schyns contre Belfius Banque SA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2008/48/CE – Obligations précontractuelles – Article 5, paragraphe 6 – Obligation pour le prêteur de rechercher le crédit le mieux adapté – Article 8, paragraphe 1 – Obligation pour le prêteur de s’abstenir de conclure le contrat de prêt en cas de doutes sur la solvabilité du consommateur – Obligation pour le prêteur d’apprécier l’opportunité du crédit.#Affaire C-58/18.

cjeu_case ·
39818

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Michel Schyns v Belfius Banque SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Justice de Paix du canton de Visé.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Pre-contractual obligations — Article 5(6) — Obligation on the creditor to seek to establish the credit most suitable — Article 8(1) — Obligation on the creditor to refrain from concluding the loan agreement if there are doubts over the creditworthiness of the consumer — Obligation on the creditor to assess the expediency of the credit.#Case C-58/18.

cjeu_case ·
39819

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 6 juin 2019.#V contre Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) et Securex Integrity ASBL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coordination des systèmes de sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règlement (CE) no 883/2004 – Dispositions transitoires – Article 87, paragraphe 8 – Règlement (CEE) no 1408/71 – Article 14 quater, sous b) – Travailleur exerçant une activité salariée et une activité non salariée dans différents États membres – Dérogations au principe d’unicité de la législation nationale applicable – Double affiliation – Introduction d’une demande en vue d’être soumis à la législation applicable en vertu du règlement no 883/2004.#Affaire C-33/18.

cjeu_case ·
39820

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#V v Institut national d'assurances sociales pour travailleurs indépendants (Inasti) and Securex Integrity ASBL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Coordination of social security systems — Migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Transitional provisions — Article 87(8) — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 14c(b) — Worker pursuing an activity as an employed person and an activity as a self-employed person in different Member States — Derogations from the principle that the legislation of a single Member State is to apply — Dual affiliation — Submission of a request to be subject to the legislation applicable pursuant to Regulation No 883/2004.#Case C-33/18.

cjeu_case ·