Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
3941

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-557/23.

cjeu_case ·
3942

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern.#Case T-556/23.

cjeu_case ·
3943

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern.#Case T-556/23.

cjeu_case ·
3944

Case T-558/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Swissgrid v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
3945

Case T-557/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Swissgrid v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality)

cjeu_case ·
3946

Case T-556/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Swissgrid v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern)

cjeu_case ·
3952

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2025.#Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei (ANRE).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of the Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility.#Case C-775/23.

cjeu_case ·
3953

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2025.#Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei (ANRE).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of the Justice – Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the relationship between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility.#Case C-775/23.

cjeu_case ·
3954

Case C-775/23, Bursa Română de Mărfuri (Legal monopoly for intermediation services in the electricity sector): Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Romania) – Bursa Română de Mărfuri SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Reglementare în domeniul Energiei (ANRE) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a response by the Court and the connection between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
3956

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025.#SV v CY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive (EU) 2024/1069 – Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-114/25.

cjeu_case ·
3957

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025.#SV v CY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive (EU) 2024/1069 – Applicability ratione temporis and ratione materiae – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court – Directive (EU) 2019/1937 – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-114/25.

cjeu_case ·