39521Case C-472/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 20 June 2019 — Vert Marine SAS v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie et des Financescjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39522Case C-471/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 20 June 2019 — Middlegate Europe NV v Ministerraadcjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39523Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark WKU WORLD KICKBOXING AND KARATE UNION — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39524Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Klaus Nonnemacher v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark WKU — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-389/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39525Case T-390/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2019 — Nonnemacher v EUIPO — Ingram (WKU WORLD KICKBOXING AND KARATE UNION) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark WKU WORLD KICKBOXING AND KARATE UNION — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39526Case T-389/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2019 — Nonnemacher v EUIPO — Ingram (WKU) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark WKU — Earlier EU word marks WKA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Article 61(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39527Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#FCA US LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Partial declaration of invalidity — Word mark VIPER — Earlier national word mark VIPER — Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case C-795/18 P.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39528Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#SATI - Società Autocooperative Trasporti Italiani SpA v Azienda di Trasporti Molisana SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services — Article 5 — Direct award of public service contracts — Prohibited under national law — Article 8(2) — Transitional arrangements.#Case C-475/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39529Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale et Associazione Volontaria di Pubblica Assistenza « Croce Verde » contre Ulss 5 Polesana Rovigo et Regione del Veneto.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation des marchés publics de fournitures, de travaux ou de services – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 10, sous h) – Exclusions spécifiques pour les marchés de services – Services ambulanciers de transport de patients – Notion.#Affaire C-424/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39530Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale and Associazione Volontaria di Pubblica Assistenza 'Croce Verde' v Ulss 5 Polesana Rovigo and Regione del Veneto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement of supplies, works or services — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10(h) — Specific exclusions for service contracts — Patient transport ambulance services — Concept.#Case C-424/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39531Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Schiaffini Travel SpA v Comune di Latina.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 5 — Award of public service contracts — Article 5(2) — Direct award — Concept of ‘internal operator’ — Article 8(2) — Transitional arrangement.#Case C-322/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39532Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.#Case C-404/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39533Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Jamina Hakelbracht and Others v WTG Retail BVBA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee.#Case C-404/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39534Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#Grup Servicii Petroliere SA contre Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor et Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 148, sous a) et c) – Exonérations liées aux transports internationaux – Livraison de plateformes de forage en mer autoélévatrices – Notion de “bateaux affectés à la navigation en haute mer” – Portée.#Affaire C-291/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39535Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Grup Servicii Petroliere SA v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală – Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 148(a) and (c) — Exemptions related to international transport — Supply of offshore jackup drilling rigs — Concept of ‘vessels used for navigation on the high seas’ — Scope.#Case C-291/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39536Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Línea Directa Aseguradora SA v Segurcaixa Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3, first paragraph — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Damage to building as a result of a fire in a vehicle parked in the private garage of the building — Compulsory insurance cover.#Case C-100/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39537Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Línea Directa Aseguradora SA v Segurcaixa Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3, first paragraph — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Damage to building as a result of a fire in a vehicle parked in the private garage of the building — Compulsory insurance cover.#Case C-100/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39538Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui contre Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4, point 1 – Principe de non-discrimination – Secteur public de l’enseignement – Réglementation nationale accordant un complément de rémunération uniquement aux enseignants employés dans le cadre d’une relation de travail à durée indéterminée en tant que fonctionnaires statutaires – Exclusion des enseignants employés en tant qu’agents contractuels de droit public à durée déterminée – Notion de “raisons objectives” – Caractéristiques inhérentes au statut de fonctionnaire statutaire.#Affaire C-72/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39539Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui v Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Pamplona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/CE – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Public sector education – National provision granting additional remuneration only to teachers employed for an indefinite duration as established public officials – Exclusion of teachers employed under a fixed-term contract governed by public law – Concept of ‘objective grounds’ – Characteristics inherent in the status of established public officials.#Case C-72/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.
39540Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#« Oribalt Rīga » SIA contre Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Article 30, paragraphe 2, sous b) et c) – Règlement (CEE) no 2454/93 – Article 152, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b) – Détermination de la valeur en douane des marchandises – Notion de “marchandises similaires” – Médicaments – Prise en compte de tout élément pouvant avoir une incidence sur la valeur économique du médicament concerné – Délai de 90 jours dans lequel les marchandises importées doivent être vendues dans l’Union européenne – Délai de rigueur – Absence de prise en compte des remises commerciales.#Affaire C-1/18.cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.