3921Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#FW and Others v European External Action Service.#Case T-542/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3922Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Huda Beauty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-333/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3923Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Huda Beauty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-333/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3924Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3925Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-169/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3926Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 8 octobre 2025.#NTT Data Belgique e.a. contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Conseil informatique pour des applications spécifiques à la BEI – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire – Offre anormalement basse – Obligation de motivation – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Proportionnalité.#Affaire T-161/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3927Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#NTT Data Belgique and Others v European Investment Bank.#Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – IT Consultancy for EIB-specific Applications – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-161/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3928Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#CQ v European Economic and Social Committee.#Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time limit – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-117/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3929Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#CQ v European Economic and Social Committee.#Case T-117/24.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3930Case T-586/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top Ten (Doors) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3931Case T-585/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Doors Bulgaria v EUIPO – Top Ten (Doors) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3932Case T-562/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Capella v EUIPO – Richemont International (COLORATURA) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA – Earlier national word mark COLORATURA – Priority claim – Concept of first application – Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Reasonable time)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3933Case T-542/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – FW and Others v EEAS (Civil service – Staff of the EEAS – Remuneration – Family allowances – Education allowance – Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Refusal to reimburse nursery and school fees – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of sound administration – Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3934Case T-333/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark déjà-vu – Genuine use of the mark – Proof of genuine use – Duration of use – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3935Case T-169/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – PMC Vlissingen Netherlands v Commission (Environment and protection of human health – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 – Classification and labelling of dibutyltin oxide – Criteria for classification of a substance in the hazard class reproductive toxicity, Category 1B – Absence of public consultation on the opinion of ECHA’s Committee for Risk Assessment – No obligation to review – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Read-across – Maternal toxicity – Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3936Case T-161/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – NTT Data Belgique and Others v EIB (Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – IT Consultancy for EIB-specific Applications – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3937Case T-117/24: Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2025 – CQ v EESC (Civil service – Officials – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Obligation to state reasons – Impartiality – Right to be heard – Length of the administrative procedure – Reasonable time limit – Error of assessment – Liability – Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3938Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3939Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.
3940Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-557/23.cjeu_case · 8 октября 2025 г.