Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
38642

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against persons, groups and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Principle of non-interference – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Authentication of the Council measures.#Case T-308/18.

cjeu_case ·
38643

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against persons, groups and entities with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Principle of non-interference – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Authentication of the Council measures.#Case T-308/18.

cjeu_case ·
38644

Case T-308/18: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2019 — Hamas v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against persons, groups and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — Whether an authority of a third State can be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Principle of non-interference — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Authentication of Council acts)

cjeu_case ·
38647

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 4 septembre 2019.#GP contre Bundesagentur für Arbeit - Familienkasse Baden-Württemberg West.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité sociale – Travailleurs migrants – Règles de l’Union européenne sur la conversion des monnaies – Règlement (CE) no 987/2009 – Décision H3 de la commission administrative pour la coordination des affaires sociales – Calcul du complément différentiel des allocations familiales dû à un travailleur résidant dans un État membre et travaillant en Suisse – Détermination de la date de référence du taux de change.#Affaire C-473/18.

cjeu_case ·
38648

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#GP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit, Familienkasse Baden-Württemberg West.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – EU rules on currency conversion – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Decision No H3 of the Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems – Calculation of the differential supplement to family allowances that is payable to a worker residing in a Member State and working in Switzerland – Determination of the reference date for the rate of conversion.#Case C-473/18.

cjeu_case ·
38649

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 septembre 2019.#Alessandro Salvoni contre Anna Maria Fiermonte.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 53 – Certificat relatif à une décision en matière civile et commerciale figurant à l’annexe 1 – Pouvoirs de la juridiction d’origine – Vérification d’office de l’existence de violations des règles de compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs.#Affaire C-347/18.

cjeu_case ·
38650

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 53 — Certificate relating to a judgment in civil and commercial matters in Annex I — Powers of the court of origin — Automatic verification whether there have been breaches of the rules on jurisdiction concerning consumer contracts.#Case C-347/18.

cjeu_case ·
38651

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 septembre 2019.#Skatteministeriet contre KPC Herning.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Vente d’un terrain sur lequel se trouve un bâtiment au moment de la livraison – Qualification – Articles 12 et 135 – Notion de “terrain à bâtir” – Notion de “bâtiment” – Appréciation de la réalité économique et commerciale – Évaluation des éléments objectifs – Intention des parties.#Affaire C-71/18.

cjeu_case ·
38652

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Skatteministeriet v KPC Herning.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Sale of land on which a building is located at the time of supply — Classification — Articles 12 and 135 — Concept of ‘building land’ — Concept of ‘building’ — Assessment of the economic and commercial reality — Evaluation of objective evidence — Intention of the parties.#Case C-71/18.

cjeu_case ·
38653

C-473/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — GP v Bundesagentur für Arbeit, Familienkasse Baden-Württemberg West (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – EU rules on the conversion of currencies – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Decision No H3 of the Administrative Commission for the coordination of social security systems – Calculation of the differential supplement for family allowance, owed to a worker residing in a Member State and working in Switzerland – Determination of the reference date for the exchange rate)

cjeu_case ·
38654

Case C-347/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano — Italy) — Avv. Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 53 – Certificate relating to a judgment in civil and commercial matters in Annex I – Powers of the court of origin – Automatic verification whether there have been breaches of the rules on jurisdiction concerning consumer contracts)

cjeu_case ·
38655

Case C-71/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet v KPC Herning (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Sale of land on which a building is located at the time of supply – Classification – Articles 12 and 135 – Concept of ‘building land’ – Concept of ‘building’ – Assessment of the economic and commercial reality – Evaluation of objective evidence – Intention of the parties)

cjeu_case ·
38656

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Axis 4 ‘Leader’ — Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — Administrative checks — Obligation to implement a suitable system for evaluating the reasonableness of the costs — Contribution in kind in the form of unpaid voluntary work — Contribution in kind in the form of a contribution of immovable property — On-the-spot checks — Presence of documents supporting payment claims — Implementation of operations financed in accordance with the rules on public procurement.#Case T-603/17.

cjeu_case ·
38657

Affaire T-603/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2019 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 — Axis 4 ‘Leader’ — Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 — Administrative checks — Obligation to implement a suitable system for evaluating the reasonableness of the costs — Contribution in kind in the form of unpaid voluntary work — Contribution in kind in the form of a contribution of immovable property — On-the-spot checks — Presence of documents supporting payment claims — Implementation of operations financed in accordance with the rules on public procurement)

cjeu_case ·
38658

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 septembre 2019.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV contre Prime Champ Deutschland Pilzkulturen GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Organisation commune des marchés des produits agricoles – Fruits et légumes – Règles de commercialisation – Notion de “pays d’origine” – Règlement (CE) no 1234/2007 – Article 113 bis, paragraphe 1 – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 76, paragraphe 1 – Définitions relatives à l’origine non préférentielle des marchandises – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Article 23, paragraphe 1 et paragraphe 2, sous b) – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Article 60, paragraphe 1 – Règlement délégué (UE) 2015/2446 – Article 31, sous b) – Étapes de la production effectuées dans un autre État membre – Étiquetage des denrées alimentaires – Interdiction d’un étiquetage de nature à induire le consommateur en erreur – Directive 2000/13/CE – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous a), i) – Règlement (UE) no 1169/2011 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Article 1er, paragraphe 4 – Article 2, paragraphe 3 – Mentions explicatives.#Affaire C-686/17.

cjeu_case ·
38659

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV v Prime Champ Deutschland Pilzkulturen GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products — Fruit and vegetables — Marketing rules — Concept of ‘country of origin’ — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Article 113a(1) — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Article 76(1) — Definitions relating to the non-preferential origin of goods — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 23(1) and (2)(b) — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 60(1) — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 — Article 31(b) — Stages of production carried out in another Member State — Labelling of foodstuffs — Prohibition on labelling which could mislead the consumer — Directive 2000/13/EC — Article 2(1)(a)(i) — Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 — Article 7(1)(a) — Article 1(4) — Article 2(3) — Explanatory elements.#Case C-686/17.

cjeu_case ·
38660

Case C-686/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs Frankfurt am Main eV v Prime Champ Deutschland Pilzkulturen GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Fruit and vegetables – Marketing rules – Concept of ‘country of origin’ – Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 – Article 113 a(1) – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 76(1) – Definitions concerning the non-preferential origin of goods – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 23(1) and 23(2)(b) – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 60()1 – Delegated Regulation (EU)2015/2446 – Article 31(b) – Production steps carried out in another Member States – Labelling of foodstuffs – Prohibition on labelling which may mislead the consumer – Directive 2000/13/EC – Article 2(1)(a)(i) – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Article 7(1)(a) – Article 1(4) – Article 2(3) – Explanatory notes)

cjeu_case ·