38461Case T-137/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Souruh v Council (Action for damages — Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38462Case T-62/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38463Case T-61/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Drex Technologies v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38464Case T-59/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Makhlouf v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38465Case T-58/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Othman v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38466Case T-57/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Makhlouf v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38467Case T-56/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38468Case T-55/19: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Cham Holding and Bena Properties v Council (Action for compensation — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Lack of competence)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38469Case T-34/19: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2019 — Orkla Foods Danmark v EUIPO (PRODUCED WITHOUT BOILING SCANDINAVIAN DELIGHTS ESTABLISHED 1834 FRUIT SPREAD) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark PRODUCED WITHOUT BOILING SCANDINAVIAN DELIGHTS ESTABLISHED 1834 FRUIT SPREAD — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38470Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Vitromed GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word elements Vitromed Germany — Rejection of the application.#Case C-124/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38471Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Grounds of appeal not satisfying the requirements of Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible — Action brought by an actual or legal person against a Member State — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded — Appeal brought against a newsletter from the Registry of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-98/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38472Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Portuguese Republic.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Grounds of appeal not satisfying the requirements of Article 169(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible — Action brought by an actual or legal person against a Member State — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded — Appeal brought against a newsletter from the Registry of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-98/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38473Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Camomilla Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings – Word mark CAMOMILLA — Rejection in part of the application for a declaration of invalidity.#Case C-68/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38474Case C-677/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Vâlcea (Romania) lodged on 11 September 2019 — S.C. Valoris S.R.L. v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Craiova — Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Vâlcea and Administrația Fondului pentru Mediucjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38475Case C-676/19 P: Appeal brought on 11 September 2019 by Bruno Gollnisch against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 11 July 2019 in Case T-95/18, Gollnisch v Parliamentcjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38476Case C-673/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 11 September 2019 — M, A, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, other parties: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, Tcjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38477Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#ruwido austria GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark transparent pairing — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-649/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38478Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#YL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Disciplinary measure.#Case T-545/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38479Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#YL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2017 promotion procedure – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 7 with effect from 1 January 2017 – Article 45 of the Staff Regulations – Article 9(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Misuse of powers – Disciplinary measure.#Case T-545/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.
38480Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-286/18.cjeu_case · 11 сентября 2019 г.