38341Case T-677/17: Order of the General Court of 18 September 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission (Action for annulment — Internal market — Environment — Regulation (EU) 2017/1154 — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38342Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Finanzamt Kyritz contre Wolf-Henning Peters.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c) – Exonérations – Hospitalisation et soins médicaux – Prestations de soins à la personne effectuées dans le cadre de l’exercice des professions médicales et paramédicales – Absence de rapport de confiance entre le prestataire de soins et le patient.#Affaire C-700/17.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38343Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#Finanzamt Kyritz v Wolf-Henning Peters.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(b) and (c) — Exemptions — Hospital and medical care — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — No confidential relationship between the person providing the care and the patient.#Case C-700/17.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38344Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 18 septembre 2019.#Commission européenne contre République italienne.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Directive 2004/18/CE – Coordination des procédures de passation des marchés publics de travaux, de fournitures et de services – Concessions de travaux publics – Prorogation de la durée d’une concession existante pour la construction et l’exploitation d’une autoroute, sans publication d’un avis de marché.#Affaire C-526/17.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38345Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 2004/18/EC – Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Public works concession contracts – Extension of the duration of an existing concession for the construction and operation of a motorway without publication of a contract notice.#Case C-526/17.cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38346Case C-700/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Kyritz v Wolf-Henning Peters (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(b) and (c) — Exemptions — Hospital and medical care — Provision of medical care in the exercise of the medical and paramedical professions — No confidential relationship between the person providing the care and the patient)cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38347Case C-526/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 September 2019 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 258 TFEU — Directive 2004/18/EC — Coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Public works concession contracts — Extension of the duration of an existing concession for the construction and operation of a motorway, without publication of a contract notice)cjeu_case · 18 сентября 2019 г.
38348Case T-624/19: Action brought on 17 September 2019 — Welter’s v EUIPO (Shape of a handgrip with bristles)cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38350Case T-19/19: Order of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Fastweb v Commissioncjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38351Case C-685/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankenthal (Germany) lodged on 17 September 2019 — OK v Daimler AGcjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38352Case C-684/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 17 September 2019 — mk advokaten GbR v MBK Rechtsanwälte GbRcjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38353Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 17 September 2019.#NJ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘European arrest warrant’ — Minimum requirements on which validity depends — Article 6(1) — Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ — European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office of a Member State — Status — Whether subordinate to a body of the executive — Power of a Minister for Justice to issue instructions in a specific case — Certification of the European arrest warrant by a court before its transmission.#Case C-489/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38354Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#André Geske v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-634/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38355Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Rose Gesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark TON JONES — Earlier national and international figurative marks Jones — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 10 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-633/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38356Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Aroma Essence Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a washing sponge — Earlier designs — Grounds for invalidity — Examination by the Board of Appeal of its own motion of the facts constituting disclosure — Burden of proof on the invalidity applicant — Requirements relating to the reproduction of the prior design.#Case T-532/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38357Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Pharmadom v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark MediWell — Earlier national word mark WELL AND WELL and earlier national figurative mark well & well LES PHARMACIENS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-502/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38358Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#Grupo Bimbo, SAB de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Tia Rosa — Earlier national figurative mark TIA ROSA — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-464/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38359Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2019.#TrekStor Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Theatre — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-399/18.cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.
38360Case T-634/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 17 сентября 2019 г.