Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
38203

Case T-716/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — The Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic Compass Greatest care in getting it there — Earlier international figurative mark IDÉA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
38208

Case T-287/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — M.I. Industries v EUIPO — Natural Instinct (Nature’s Variety Instinct) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Nature’s Variety Instinct — Earlier national figurative mark Natural Instinct Dog and Cat food as nature intended — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
38210

Case T-47/18: Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2019 — UZ v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Psychological harassment — Disciplinary sanction — Downgrading by one grade and resetting of promotion points to zero — Rejection of the applicant’s request for assistance — Manner in which the administrative investigation was carried out — Requirement of impartiality — Right to be heard — Procedural irregularity — Consequences of the procedural irregularity)

cjeu_case ·
38211

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Evaluation of substances – Benpat – Persistence – ECHA decision requesting further information – Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Action brought before the Board of Appeal – Task of the Board of Appeal – Adversarial procedure – Nature of review – Intensity of review – Powers of the Board of Appeal – Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Conferral of powers on EU agencies – Principle of conferral – Principle of subsidiarity – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-755/17.

cjeu_case ·
38212

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Evaluation of substances – Benpat – Persistence – ECHA decision requesting further information – Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Action brought before the Board of Appeal – Task of the Board of Appeal – Adversarial procedure – Nature of review – Intensity of review – Powers of the Board of Appeal – Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Conferral of powers on EU agencies – Principle of conferral – Principle of subsidiarity – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-755/17.

cjeu_case ·
38213

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Havenbedrijf Antwerpen NV and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven NV v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Concept of economic activity – Services of general economic interest – Non-economic activities – Separable nature – Selective nature – Request for a transitional period.#Case T-696/17.

cjeu_case ·
38214

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Havenbedrijf Antwerpen NV and Maatschappij van de Brugse Zeehaven NV v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Concept of economic activity – Services of general economic interest – Non-economic activities – Separable nature – Selective nature – Request for a transitional period.#Case T-696/17.

cjeu_case ·
38215

Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre élargie) du 20 septembre 2019.#Le Port de Bruxelles et Région de Bruxelles-Capitale contre Commission européenne.#Aides d’État – Régime d’exonération de l’impôt des sociétés mis à exécution par la Belgique en faveur de ses ports – Décision déclarant le régime d’aides incompatible avec le marché intérieur – Notion d’activité économique – Services d’intérêt économique général – Activités non économiques – Caractère dissociable – Caractère sélectif – Article 93 TFUE et article 106, paragraphe 2, TFUE.#Affaire T-674/17.

cjeu_case ·
38216

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Le Port de Bruxelles and Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-674/17.

cjeu_case ·
38217

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-673/17.

cjeu_case ·
38218

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2019.#Port autonome du Centre et de l'Ouest SCRL and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by Belgium in favour of its ports — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market — Concept of economic activity — Services of general economic interest — Non-economic activities — Severability — Selectivity — Article 93 TFEU and Article 106(2) TFEU.#Case T-673/17.

cjeu_case ·
38219

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 (Extracts).#Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury.#Case T-650/17.

cjeu_case ·
38220

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019 (Extracts).#Jinan Meide Casting Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2017/1146 — Imports of threaded tube or pipe cast fittings, of malleable cast iron, originating in China, manufactured by Jinan Meide Castings Co., Ltd — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Resumption of the procedure following the partial annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 430/2013 — Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(7)(a), (10) and (11) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Normal value — Fair comparison — Non-matching product types — Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(1) to (3) and Article 9(4) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury.#Case T-650/17.

cjeu_case ·