38081Case C-703/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 24 September 2019 — J.K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicachcjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38082Case C-467/19 PPU: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019 — (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against QR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 7(4) — Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings — Right to remain silent and right not to incriminate oneself — Agreement between the prosecutor and the offender — Approval of such an agreement by the court — Condition — Consent of the other accused persons — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Not applicable)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38083Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Daimler AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark ROAD EFFICIENCY — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-749/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38084Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#French Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenses incurred by France under the Programme of Options Specifically Relating to Remoteness and Insularity (POSEI) — Inaccurate accounting for certain consignments of bananas (financial years 2013 — 2016) — Flat-rate financial correction.#Case T-507/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38085Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#French Republic v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenses incurred by France under the Programme of Options Specifically Relating to Remoteness and Insularity (POSEI) — Inaccurate accounting for certain consignments of bananas (financial years 2013 — 2016) — Flat-rate financial correction.#Case T-507/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38086Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#IAK GmbH - Forum International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark IAK — Earlier national word mark IAK — Institut für angewandte Kreativität — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-497/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38087Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Igor Zhadanov v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark Scanner Pro — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-492/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38088Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Igor Zhadanov v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark PDF Expert — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-404/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38089Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Igor Zhadanov v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark PDF Expert — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-404/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38090Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Volvo Trademark Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark V V-WHEELS — Earlier EU, national and unregistered figurative marks VOLVO — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-356/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38091Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Volvo Trademark Holding AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark V V-WHEELS — Earlier EU, national and unregistered figurative marks VOLVO — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-356/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38092Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-301/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38093Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Viktor Feodorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-300/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38094Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Roxtec AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative trade mark depicting a black square containing seven concentric blue circles — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-261/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38095Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Roxtec AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative trade mark depicting a black square containing seven concentric blue circles — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-261/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38096Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#US v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Fixed-term contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-255/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38097Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#US v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Fixed-term contract — Contract for an indefinite period — Refusal to reclassify a fixed term contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-255/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38098Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Piaggio & C. SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a moped – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Informed user – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Interpretation of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 in conformity with EU law – No use of an unregistered earlier national three-dimensional mark in the registered design – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 – No unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design – Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-219/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38099Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Piaggio & C. SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a moped – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Informed user – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Interpretation of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 in conformity with EU law – No use of an unregistered earlier national three-dimensional mark in the registered design – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 – No unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design – Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-219/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.
38100Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Pink Lady America LLC v Community Plant Variety Office.#Plant varieties — Nullity proceedings — Cripps Pink apple variety — Articles 10 and 116 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 — Novelty — Derogative grace period — Definition of exploitation of the variety — Commercial evaluation — Article 76 of Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 — Late submission of evidence before the Board of Appeal — Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court.#Case T-112/18.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2019 г.