38041Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 26 September 2019.#Mowi ASA v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Control of concentrations between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Article 4(1) — Prior notification obligation for concentrations — Article 7(1) — Standstill obligation — Article 7(2) — Exemption — Concept of a ‘single concentration’ — Article 14(2) — Decision imposing fines for the implementation of a concentration before it has been notified and authorised — Principle ne bis in idem — Set‑off principle — Concurrent offences.#Case C-10/18 P.cjeu_case · 26 сентября 2019 г.
38042Case C-600/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — UTEP 2006. SRL v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Articles 91 and 92 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 — Article 32(3), Article 33(1) and Article 41(1) — Infringement of the rules on the use of tachographs — Duty of Member States to make provision for effective, dissuasive and non-discriminatory penalties — Resident and non-resident small and medium-sized enterprises — Differential treatment)cjeu_case · 26 сентября 2019 г.
38043Case C-556/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019 — Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — European Union water policy — Directive 2000/60/EC — Article 13(1) and (7) and Article 15(1) — Failure to adopt, publish and communicate to the European Commission revised and updated river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro (Spain) — Article 14 — Failure to inform and consult the public relating to the revision and the updating)cjeu_case · 26 сентября 2019 г.
38044Case C-63/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Vitali SpA v Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 71 — Subcontracting — National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30 % of the total amount of the contract)cjeu_case · 26 сентября 2019 г.
38045Case C-11/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019 — Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the appellant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 26 сентября 2019 г.
38046Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Nathaniel Magnan v European Commission.#Action for failure to act, for damages and for annulment — Free movement of workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Alleged infringement of that agreement by Swiss laws and regulations governing the exercise of the profession of medical practitioner — Application for the adoption of measures against Switzerland and application for compensation for harm suffered — Reply of EEAS — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-99/19.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38047Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Nathaniel Magnan v European Commission.#Action for failure to act, for damages and for annulment — Free movement of workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Alleged infringement of that agreement by Swiss laws and regulations governing the exercise of the profession of medical practitioner — Application for the adoption of measures against Switzerland and application for compensation for harm suffered — Reply of EEAS — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-99/19.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38048Case T-660/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 — Universität Bremen v Commission and REAcjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38049Case T-642/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 — JCDecaux Street Furniture Belgium v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38050Case T-640/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v ECHAcjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38051Case T-639/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 — Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo v EUIPO — Embutidos Monells (5Ms MMMMM)cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38052Case T-638/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO – Valvis Holding (Shape of a bottle)cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38053Case T-637/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 – Sun Stars & Sons v EUIPO – Carpathian Springs (Shape of a bottle)cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38054Case T-635/19: Action brought on 25 September 2019 — Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pesaro and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38055Case T-99/19: Order of the General Court of 25 September 2019 — Magnan v Commission (Action for failure to act, for damages and for annulment — Free movement of workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Alleged infringement of that agreement by Swiss laws and regulations governing the exercise of the profession of medical practitioner — Application for the adoption of measures against Switzerland and application for compensation for harm suffered — Reply of EEAS — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38056Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Mas Que Vinos Global, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark EL SEÑORITO — Rejection of the application for registration — Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case C-278/19 P.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38057Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Mouvement pour une Europe des nations et des libertés v European Parliament.#Appeal — Institutional law — Political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 — Article 7 — Prohibition on the indirect funding of a national political party — Decision of the European Parliament declaring certain expenses of a political party at the European level ineligible for a grant in respect of the financial year 2015 — Principle of sound administration — Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-60/19 P.cjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38058Case C-711/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Admiral Sportwetten GmbH and Otherscjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38059Case C-710/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 25 September 2019 — G.M.A. v Belgian Statecjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.
38060Case C-709/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v BP plccjeu_case · 25 сентября 2019 г.