Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
3781

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3782

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3783

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#A-GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Anti-dumping – Extended anti-dumping duty – Exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in China – Exemption for the importation of small quantities by small-scale operators – Threshold of 300 units per type of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation by a party or delivered to it.#Case C-659/24.

cjeu_case ·
3784

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#A-GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Anti-dumping – Extended anti-dumping duty – Exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in China – Exemption for the importation of small quantities by small-scale operators – Threshold of 300 units per type of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation by a party or delivered to it.#Case C-659/24.

cjeu_case ·
3787

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.

cjeu_case ·
3788

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.

cjeu_case ·
3789

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long flight delays – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid an extraordinary circumstance or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and consequently subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.

cjeu_case ·
3790

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long flight delays – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid an extraordinary circumstance or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and consequently subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.

cjeu_case ·
3791

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Polismyndigheten v Konkurrensverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of a framework agreement during its term – Value of the modification below the values laid down in Article 72(2) – Modification of the remuneration model of a framework agreement – Substantial modification of a framework agreement – Alteration of the overall nature of a framework agreement.#Case C-282/24.

cjeu_case ·
3792

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Polismyndigheten v Konkurrensverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of a framework agreement during its term – Value of the modification below the values laid down in Article 72(2) – Modification of the remuneration model of a framework agreement – Substantial modification of a framework agreement – Alteration of the overall nature of a framework agreement.#Case C-282/24.

cjeu_case ·
3794

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Felicísima v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal and IATA España SLU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 4 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage by air – Montreal Convention – Article 17(2) – Concept of ‘baggage’ – Article 22(2) – Air carrier liability in the event of loss of baggage – Loss of a passenger’s pet – Compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-218/24.

cjeu_case ·
3795

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – State measure extending gambling licences granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections – Rejection of a complaint – No examination of the existence of a potential indirect advantage – Scope of the Commission’s duty to carry out an examination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3796

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – State measure extending gambling licences granted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands – Decision of the European Commission not to raise objections – Rejection of a complaint – No examination of the existence of a potential indirect advantage – Scope of the Commission’s duty to carry out an examination – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
3799

Case C-805/24 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025 – Timchenko and Timchenko v Council (Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States)

cjeu_case ·
3800

Case C-659/24, A-GmbH & Co. KG (Imports of certain bicycle parts): Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof – Germany) – A-GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt C (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Anti-dumping – Extended anti-dumping duty – Exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in China – Exemption for the importation of small quantities by small-scale operators – Threshold of 300 units per type of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation by a party or delivered to it)

cjeu_case ·