37861Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark ADPepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) and Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-668/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37862Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark ADPepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) and Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-668/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37863Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative mark ad pepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-666/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37864Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative mark ad pepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-666/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37865Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Wanda Films, SL and Wanda Visión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wanda films — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37866Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Wanda Films, SL and Wanda Visión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WANDA FILMS — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-533/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37867Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MG PUMA — Earlier EU word mark GINMG — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-500/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37868Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MG PUMA — Earlier EU word mark GINMG — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-500/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37869Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Vafo Praha s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Meatlove — Earlier EU word mark carnilove — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-491/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37870Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Vafo Praha s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Meatlove — Earlier EU word mark carnilove — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-491/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37871Case T-730/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — DQ and Others v Parliament (Civil Service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Scope of the duty to provide assistance — Removal measure — Duration of the administrative procedure — Liability — Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37872Case T-686/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — LegalCareers v EUIPO (LEGALCAREERS) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark LEGALCAREERS — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 7(1)(b)of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37873Case T-668/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — 6Minutes Media v EUIPO — ad pepper media International (ADPepper) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark ADPepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) and Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37874Case T-666/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — 6Minutes Media v EUIPO — ad pepper media International (ad pepper) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative mark ad pepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37875Case T-542/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 – Wanda Films and Wanda Visión v EUIPO – Dalian Wanda Group Co. (wanda films) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wanda films — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37876Case T-533/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 – Wanda Films and Wanda Visión v EUIPO – Dalian Wanda Group (WANDA FILMS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WANDA FILMS — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37877Case T-500/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — Destilerias MG (MG PUMA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MG PUMA — Earlier EU word mark GINMG — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37878Case T-491/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2019 — Vafo Praha v EUIPO — Rutzinger-Kurpas (Meatlove) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Meatlove — Earlier EU word mark carnilove — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37879Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 3 octobre 2019.#OF contre PG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (CE) no 2201/2003 – Compétence pour connaître d’une demande en divorce – Compétence en matière de responsabilité parentale et d’obligation alimentaire à l’égard de l’enfant mineur du couple – Saisine de la juridiction de l’État de nationalité des parties – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Résidence de l’enfant mineur et des parents dans un autre État membre – Article 12, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Prorogation de compétence – Article 17 – Vérification de compétence – Notion de “responsabilité parentale”.#Affaire C-759/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.
37880Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#OF v PG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Rădăuţi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Jurisdiction to hear and determine an application for divorce — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility and maintenance obligations with regard to the couple’s minor child — Bringing of proceedings before a court of the State of the nationality of the parties — Article 3(1)(b) — Minor child and parents resident in another Member State — Article 12(1)(b) — Prorogation of jurisdiction — Article 17 — Ascertaining jurisdiction — Concept of ‘parental responsibility’.#Case C-759/18.cjeu_case · 3 октября 2019 г.