37701Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Peeter Palo v European Commission.#Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pensions — Pension scheme — Severance grant — Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination — Legitimate expectations — Principle of good administration — Duty of care.#Case T-432/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37702Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Peeter Palo v European Commission.#Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pensions — Pension scheme — Severance grant — Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination — Legitimate expectations — Principle of good administration — Duty of care.#Case T-432/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37703Case T-684/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2019 — ZV v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Vacancy notice — Commission’s deputy mediator — Procedure — Assessment of the merits)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37704Case T-432/18: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2019 —Palo v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pensions — Pension scheme — Severance grant — Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination — Legitimate expectations — Principle of good administration — Duty of care)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37705Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 16 octobre 2019.#SD contre Agrárminiszter.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique agricole commune – Secteur de l’apiculture – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Règlement délégué (UE) 2015/1366 – Demande d’aide – Conditions – Nombre minimal de colonies d’abeilles – Fixation avec effet rétroactif – Principe de sécurité juridique – Principe de protection de la confiance légitime.#Affaire C-490/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37706Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#SD v Agrárminiszter.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Apiculture sector – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1366 – Application for aid – Conditions – Minimum number of bee colonies – Fixing with retro-active effect – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-490/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37707Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 octobre 2019.#UPM France SAS contre Premier ministre et Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2003/96/CE – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Article 21, paragraphe 5, troisième alinéa – Exonération des petits producteurs d’électricité, subordonnée à la taxation de l’électricité produite – Absence, pendant une période transitoire autorisée, d’une taxe intérieure sur la consommation finale d’électricité – Article 14, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Obligation d’exonération des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité utilisés pour produire de l’électricité.#Affaire C-270/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37708Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#UPM France v Premier ministre and Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Third subparagraph of Article 21(5) — Exemption of small producers of electricity, subject to the taxation of electricity produced — Lack, during an authorised transitional period, of an internal tax on end consumption of electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Obligation to exempt energy products and electricity used to produce electricity.#Case C-270/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37709Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 octobre 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. contre Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 167 et 168 – Droit à déduction de la TVA – Refus – Fraude – Administration des preuves – Principe du respect des droits de la défense – Droit d’être entendu – Accès au dossier – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Contrôle juridictionnel effectif – Principe d’égalité des armes – Principe du contradictoire – Réglementation ou pratique nationale selon laquelle, lors d’une vérification du droit à déduction de la TVA exercé par un assujetti, l’administration fiscale est liée par les constatations de fait et les qualifications juridiques qui ont été effectuées par elle dans le cadre de procédures administratives connexes auxquelles cet assujetti n’était pas partie.#Affaire C-189/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37710Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37711Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 octobre 2019.#Michael Winterhoff contre Finanzamt Ulm et Jochen Eisenbeis contre Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Exonérations en faveur de certaines activités d’intérêt général – Services publics postaux – Directive 97/67/CE – Prestataire du service postal universel – Opérateur privé fournissant un service de notification formelle d’actes émanant de juridictions ou d’autorités administratives.#Affaires jointes C-4/18 et C-5/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37712Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Michael Winterhoff v Finanzamt Ulm and Jochen Eisenbeisvv Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(a) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Public postal services — Directive 97/67/EC — Universal postal service provider — Private operator providing the service of formally serving court or administrative authority documents.#Joined Cases C-4/18 and C-5/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37713Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 October 2019.#European External Action Service (EEAS) v Ruben Alba Aguilera and Others.#Appeal — Civil service — Officials and members of staff — European External Action Service (EEAS) — Remuneration — Staff Regulations — Article 110 — EU staff posted to a third country — Annex X — Third subparagraph of Article 1 and Article 10 — Allowance for living conditions — Annual revision and adjustment — Reduction for staff posted to Ethiopia — Requirement to adopt general implementing provisions beforehand — Scope.#Case C-427/18 P.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37714Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 16 October 2019.#Sky plc and Others v Skykick UK Limited and Skykick Inc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Articles 7 and 51 — First Directive 89/104/EEC — Articles 3 and 13 — Identification of the goods or services covered by the registration — Failure to comply with the requirements of clarity and precision — Bad faith of the applicant — No intention to use the trade mark for the goods or services covered by the registration — Total or partial invalidity of the trade mark — National legislation requiring the applicant to state that he or she intends to use the trade mark applied for.#Case C-371/18.cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37715Case C-490/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — SD v Agrárminiszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Apiculture sector — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/1366 — Application for aid — Conditions — Minimum number of bee colonies — Fixing with retro-active effect — Principle of legal certainty — Principle of protection of legitimate expectations)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37716Case C-270/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — UPM France v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Action et des Comptes publics (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Third subparagraph of Article 21(5) — Exemption of small producers of electricity, subject to the taxation of electricity produced — Lack, during an authorised transitional period, of an internal tax on end consumption of electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Obligation to exempt energy products and electricity used to produce electricity)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37717Case C-189/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Adversarial principle — National legislation or a national practice whereby, during an assessment of the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authority is bound by the findings of fact and legal qualifications which were made by it in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not party)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37718Joined Cases C-4/18 and C-5/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof - Germany) – Michael Winterhoff, acting as liquidator of DIREKTexpress Holding AG v Finanzamt Ulm (C-4/18) and Jochen Eisenbeis, acting as liquidator of JUREX GmbH v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern (C-5/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 132(1)(a) — Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest — Public postal services — Directive 97/67/EC — Universal postal service provider — Private operator providing the service of formally serving court or administrative authority documents)cjeu_case · 16 октября 2019 г.
37719Case T-705/19: Action brought on 15 October 2019 — GV v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 октября 2019 г.