37501Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Research and technological development and space — Seventh framework programme of the Union — Audit — Failure to fill out work timesheets — Personnel costs declared ineligible — Decision of the Commission to adopt the audit report as final — Inadmissibility.#Case T-188/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37502Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#Action for annulment — Research and technological development and space — Seventh framework programme of the Union — Audit — Failure to fill out work timesheets — Personnel costs declared ineligible — Decision of the Commission to adopt the audit report as final — Inadmissibility.#Case T-188/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37503Case T-717/19: Action brought on 24 October 2019 – Associated British Foods and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37504Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#MSI Svetovanje, marketing, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark nume — Earlier EU word mark numederm — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-41/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37505Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#MSI Svetovanje, marketing, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark nume — Earlier EU word mark numederm — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-41/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37506Case T-188/19: Order of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — United Kingdom v Commission (Action for annulment — Research and technological development and space — Seventh framework programme of the Union — Audit — Failure to fill out work timesheets — Personnel costs declared ineligible — Decision of the Commission to adopt the audit report as final — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37507Case T-41/19: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2019 — MSI Svetovanje v EUIPO — Industrial Farmaceutica Cantabria (nume) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark nume — Earlier EU word mark numederm — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37508Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 24 octobre 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-614/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37509Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-614/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37510Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 24 octobre 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-613/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37511Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-613/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37512Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37513Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37514Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37515Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Porr Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Taxable amount — Reduction — Directive 2006/112/EEC — Article 90 — Principle of fiscal neutrality — Debt that became irrecoverable following insolvency proceedings.#Case C-292/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37516Case C-797/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 24 October 2019 — B-GmbH v D Tax Officecjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37517Case C-790/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Brașov (Romania) lodged on 24 October 2019 — Criminal proceedings against LG, MHcjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37518Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 24 octobre 2019.#BU contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Égalité de traitement – Impôt sur le revenu – Législation nationale – Exonération d’impôt pour les indemnités octroyées aux personnes handicapées – Indemnités perçues dans un autre État membre – Exclusion – Différence de traitement.#Affaire C-35/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37519Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#BU v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of workers — Equal treatment — Income tax — National legislation — Tax exemption for disability allowances — Allowances received in another Member State — Not included — Difference in treatment.#Case C-35/19.cjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.
37520Case C-672/19: Order of the President of the Court of 24 October 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil du Contentieux des Étrangers — Belgium) — X v État belgecjeu_case · 24 октября 2019 г.