Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
37222

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure on an escutcheon — EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Power to alter decisions.#Case T-149/19.

cjeu_case ·
37223

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure on an escutcheon — EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Power to alter decisions.#Case T-149/19.

cjeu_case ·
37225

Case T-149/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2019 — Société des produits Nestlé v EUIPO — Jumbo Africa (Representation of a human figure on an escutcheon) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure on an escutcheon — EU figurative mark representing the shape of a human figure — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Power to alter decisions)

cjeu_case ·
37227

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Armostav Místek s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-520/19.

cjeu_case ·
37230

Case C-520/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Ostravě — Czech Republic) — Armostav Místek s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství (Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
37234

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Silec Cable and General Cable Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Proof of the infringement — Presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence — Public distancing — Subjective perception of other cartel participants — Infringement committed by several undertakings constituting a single economic entity — Gravity of the infringement committed by one of these undertakings — Determination — ‘Fringe player’ or ‘moderate player’ in the cartel — Determination — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-599/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
37235

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Silec Cable and General Cable Corp. v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Proof of the infringement — Presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence — Public distancing — Subjective perception of other cartel participants — Infringement committed by several undertakings constituting a single economic entity — Gravity of the infringement committed by one of these undertakings — Determination — ‘Fringe player’ or ‘moderate player’ in the cartel — Determination — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-599/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
37236

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 14 novembre 2019.#Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) e.a. contre Institut national de l’audiovisuel.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Droit d’auteur et droits voisins – Directive 2001/29/CE – Droits exclusifs des artistes‑interprètes – Article 2, sous b) – Droit de reproduction – Article 3, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Mise à disposition du public – Autorisation – Présomption – Régime national dispensant un établissement public responsable de la conservation et de la mise en valeur du patrimoine audiovisuel national de l’obtention du consentement écrit de l’artiste-interprète pour l’exploitation d’archives comportant des fixations des exécutions de cet artiste‑interprète.#Affaire C-484/18.

cjeu_case ·
37237

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam) and Others v Institut national de l’audiovisuel.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Exclusive rights of performers — Article 2(b) — Reproduction right — Article 3(2)(a) — Making available to the public — Authorisation — Presumption — National scheme exempting a public institution responsible for the conservation and promotion of the national audiovisual heritage from the requirement to obtain the performer’s written consent for the exploitation of archives containing fixations of that performer’s performances.#Case C-484/18.

cjeu_case ·
37238

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 14 novembre 2019.#Vaselife International BV et Chrysal International BV contre College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 – Mise sur le marché des produits phytopharmaceutiques – Commerce parallèle – Modification de la durée de validité du permis de commerce parallèle – Identité du produit phytopharmaceutique et du produit de référence – Conditions.#Affaire C-445/18.

cjeu_case ·
37239

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 November 2019.#Vaselife International BV and Chrysal International BV v College voor de toelating van gewasbeschermingsmiddelen en biociden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Placing of plant protection products on the market — Parallel trade — Modification of the period of validity of the parallel trade permit — Identity of the plant protection product and the reference product — Conditions.#Case C-445/18.

cjeu_case ·
37240

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 14 novembre 2019.#State Street Bank International GmbH contre Banca d'Italia.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2014/59/UE – Redressement et résolution des établissements de crédit – Dispositif de financement national – Autorité de résolution – Fonds national – Articles 103 et 104 – Obligation de contribution – Contributions ex ante et contributions ex post extraordinaires – Calcul – Transposition tardive de la directive – Règlement délégué (UE) 2015/63 – Articles 12 et 14 – Notion de “changement de statut” – Incidence sur l’obligation de contribution.#Affaire C-255/18.

cjeu_case ·