Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
37141

Joined Cases C-203/18 and C-374/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberve-waltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, Landgericht Köln — Germany) — Deutsche Post AG, Klaus Leymann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-203/18) and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG, DPD Dynamic Parcel Distribution GmbH & Co. KG, Bundesverband Paket & Expresslogistik e.V. v Deutsche Post AG (C-374/18) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Road transport — Social legislation — Vehicles used to deliver items as part of the universal postal service — Exceptions — Vehicles partly used for such delivery — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 3(1) — ‘Universal service’ — Concept)

cjeu_case ·
37142

Case C-198/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — CeDe Group AB v KAN sp. z o.o., in liquidation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 — Articles 4 and 6 — Insolvency proceedings — Applicable law — European order for payment procedure — Failure to pay a contractual claim before bankruptcy — Exception of set-off based on a contractual claim arising prior to bankruptcy)

cjeu_case ·
37146

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark imot.bg — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-101/19.

cjeu_case ·
37147

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Rezon OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark imot.bg — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-101/19.

cjeu_case ·
37149

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 20 November 2019.#Retail Royalty Co. v Fashion Energy Srl.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-678/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37150

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may succeed) of 20 November 2019.#Retail Royalty Co. v Fashion Energy Srl.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-678/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
37158

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Indaco Service Soc. coop. sociale v Ufficio Territoriale del Governo Taranto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 57(4)(c) and (g) — Award of public service contracts — Optional grounds for exclusion — Grave professional misconduct — Calling into question the economic operator’s integrity — Prior contract — Performance — Breaches — Termination — Judicial remedy — Contracting authority’s assessment of the contractual breach — Preclusion until the end of the judicial proceedings.#Case C-552/18.

cjeu_case ·
37159

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 November 2019.#Indaco Service Soc. coop. sociale v Ufficio Territoriale del Governo Taranto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 57(4)(c) and (g) — Award of public service contracts — Optional grounds for exclusion — Grave professional misconduct — Calling into question the economic operator’s integrity — Prior contract — Performance — Breaches — Termination — Judicial remedy — Contracting authority’s assessment of the contractual breach — Preclusion until the end of the judicial proceedings.#Case C-552/18.

cjeu_case ·