37021Case T-726/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Mélin v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules governing expenses and allowances payable to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to provide the annex to the decision ordering recovery)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37022Case T-667/18: Order of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Pinto Teixeira v EEAS (Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37023Case T-665/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Soundio v EUIPO — Telefónica Germany (Vibble) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37024Case T-644/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopiderm) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37025Case T-643/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO — Faes Farma (DermoFaes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37026Case T-642/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — August Wolff v EUIPO Faes Farma (DermoFaes Atopimed) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37027Case T-592/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Wywiał-Prząda v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Remuneration — Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Work done for another State — Diplomatic status — Five-year reference period)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37028Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 28 novembre 2019.#KROL – Zakład Robót Wodno-Kanalizacyjnych Sp. z o.o., sp.k. contre Porr Polska Construction S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Directive 2000/35/CE – Article 1er et article 6, paragraphe 3 – Champ d’application – Réglementation nationale – Transactions commerciales financées par les fonds structurels et par le Fonds de cohésion de l’Union européenne – Exclusion.#Affaire C-722/18.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37029Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#KROL - Zakład Robót Wodno-Kanalizacyjnych Sp. z o.o., S.k. v Porr Polska Construction S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Directive 2000/35/EC — Article 1 and Article 6(3) — Scope — National legislation — Commercial transactions financed by the EU Structural Funds and by the EU Cohesion Fund — Exclusion.#Case C-722/18.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37030Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#LS Cable & System Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Burden of proof — Distortion of the evidence — Public distancing from the cartel.#Case C-596/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37031Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#LS Cable & System Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Burden of proof — Distortion of the evidence — Public distancing from the cartel.#Case C-596/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37032Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#ABB Ltd and ABB AB v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Burden of proof — Presumption of innocence — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-593/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37033Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#ABB Ltd and ABB AB v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Burden of proof — Presumption of innocence — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-593/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37034Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence.#Case C-591/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37035Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Brugg Kabel AG and Kabelwerke Brugg AG Holding v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Rights of the defence — Access to the file — Principle of the presumption of innocence — Distortion of the evidence.#Case C-591/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37036Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 28 November 2019.#Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national trade mark PRIMA — Article 8(1)(b) — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 76(1) — Scope of review by the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-702/18 P.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37037Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 28 November 2019.#Coty Germany GmbH v Amazon Services Europe Sàrl and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 9 — Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 9 — Rights conferred by a trade mark — Use — Stocking of goods for the purposes of offering them or putting them on the market — Storage with a view to dispatching goods sold in an online marketplace which infringe trade mark rights.#Case C-567/18.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37038Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 November 2019.#Société Générale S.A. v Agenzia delle Entrate – Direzione Regionale Lombardia Ufficio Contenzioso.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Financial transaction tax – Transactions involving derivative financial instruments based on a security issued by a company resident in the Member State of taxation – Tax due irrespective of the place of conclusion of the transaction – Administrative and reporting obligations.#Case C-565/18.cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37039Case C-722/18: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie, XXIII Wydział Gospodarczy Odwoławczy, Poland) — KROL — Zakład Robót Wodno-Kanalizacyjnych Sp. z o.o., sp.k. v Porr S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Combating late payment in commercial transactions — Directive 2000/35/EC — Article 1 and Article 6(3) — Scope — National legislation — Commercial transactions financed by the EU Structural Funds and by the EU Cohesion Fund — Exclusion)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.
37040Case C-596/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019 — LS Cable & System Ltd v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — Burden of proof — Distortion of the evidence — Public distancing from the cartel)cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.