Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

37001

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 28 novembre 2019.#Procédure pénale contre DK.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Renforcement de certains aspects de la présomption d’innocence et du droit d’assister à son procès dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 6 – Charge de la preuve – Maintien d’une personne poursuivie en détention provisoire.#Affaire C-653/19 PPU.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37002

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Criminal proceedings against Spetsializirana prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings — Article 6 — Burden of proof — Continuation of the detention on remand pending trial of an accused person.#Case C-653/19 PPU.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37003

Case C-653/19 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against DK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings — Article 6 — Burden of proof — Continuation of the detention on remand pending trial of an accused person)

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37004

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-736/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37005

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Runnebaum Invest GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-736/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37006

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions — Rules governing expenses and allowances payable to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to provide the annex to the decision ordering recovery.#Case T-726/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37007

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Joëlle Mélin v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions — Rules governing expenses and allowances payable to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Obligation to state reasons — Failure to provide the annex to the decision ordering recovery.#Case T-726/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37008

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#José Manuel Pinto Teixeira v European External Action Service.#Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage.#Case T-667/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37009

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#José Manuel Pinto Teixeira v European External Action Service.#Civil service — Rights and obligations of officials — Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Article 16 of the Staff Regulations — Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution — Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention — Implicit acceptance — Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service — Non-material damage.#Case T-667/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37010

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Soundio A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-665/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37011

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Soundio A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Vibble — Earlier German word mark vybe — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-665/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37012

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-644/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37013

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopiderm — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-644/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37014

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-643/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37015

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-643/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37016

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-642/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37017

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DermoFaes Atopimed — Earlier EU word mark Dermowas — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-642/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37018

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Katarzyna Wywiał-Prząda v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Remuneration – Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Work done for another State – Diplomatic status – Five-year reference period.#Case T-592/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37019

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2019.#Katarzyna Wywiał-Prząda v European Commission.#Civil service – Contract staff – Remuneration – Decision refusing to grant expatriation allowance – Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Work done for another State – Diplomatic status – Five-year reference period.#Case T-592/18.

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.

37020

Case T-736/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Runnebaum Invest v EUIPO — Berg Toys Beheer (Bergsteiger) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Bergsteiger — Earlier Benelux word marks and EU figurative and word marks BERG — Relative ground for refusal — Article 47(1) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Admissibility of a request for proof of genuine use — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 28 ноября 2019 г.