36681Case C-926/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie (Romania) lodged on le 18 December 2019 — Criminal proceedings against BR, CS, DT, EU, FV, GWcjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36682Case C-925/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 December 2019 — SA and SA junior v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóságcjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36683Case C-924/19 PPU: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 18 December 2019 — FMS and FNZ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóságcjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36684Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Lazarus Kft.) v European Commission.#Action for annulment — State aid — Allegedly unlawful aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Knowledge acquired — Proof — Duty of diligence — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility.#Case T-763/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36685Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. (Lazarus Kft.) v European Commission.#Action for annulment — State aid — Allegedly unlawful aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Knowledge acquired — Proof — Duty of diligence — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility.#Case T-763/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36686Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Gres de Aragón, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law.#Case T-624/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36687Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Gres de Aragón, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law.#Case T-624/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36688Case T-763/18: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Allegedly unlawful aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Alleged Commission decisions declaring the aid measure compatible with the internal market — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Knowledge acquired — Proof — Duty of diligence — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36689Case T-734/18: Order of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36690Case T-624/18: Judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2019 — Gres de Aragón v EUIPO (GRES ARAGÓN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark GRES ARAGÓN — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Error of law)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36691Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Hochtief AG v Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Directive 92/13/EEC — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Action for review of judicial decisions in breach of EU law — Liability of the Member States in the event of infringement of EU law by national courts or tribunals — Assessment of damage eligible for compensation.#Case C-362/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36692Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#Hochtief AG v Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Directive 92/13/EEC — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Action for review of judicial decisions in breach of EU law — Liability of the Member States in the event of infringement of EU law by national courts or tribunals — Assessment of damage eligible for compensation.#Case C-362/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36693Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 18 décembre 2019.#IT Development SAS contre Free Mobile SAS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Propriété intellectuelle – Respect des droits de propriété intellectuelle – Directive 2004/48/CE – Protection juridique des programmes d’ordinateur – Directive 2009/24/CE – Contrat de licence de logiciel – Modification non autorisée du code source d’un programme d’ordinateur par un licencié en violation du contrat de licence – Action en contrefaçon exercée par l’auteur du logiciel contre le licencié – Nature du régime de responsabilité applicable.#Affaire C-666/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36694Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#IT Development SAS v Free Mobile SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 2009/24/EC — Software licence agreement — Unauthorised modification of the source code of a computer program by a licensee in breach of the licence agreement — Action for infringement brought by the author of the program against the licensee — Nature of the applicable liability regime.#Case C-666/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36695Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36696Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019.#UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State.#Case C-447/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36697Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 December 2019.#Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom and pluralism of the media – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Directive 2002/21/EC – Articles 15 and 16 – National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector – Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector – Definition of the electronic communications sector – Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation – Account taken of the income of affiliated companies – Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector.#Case C-719/18.cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36698Case C-362/18: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék — Hungary) — Hochtief AG v Fővárosi Törvényszék (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Review procedures — Directive 89/665/EEC — Directive 92/13/EEC — Right to effective judicial protection — Principles of effectiveness and equivalence — Action for review of judicial decisions in breach of EU law — Liability of the Member States in the event of infringement of EU law by national courts or tribunals — Assessment of damage eligible for compensation)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36699Case C-666/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — IT Development SAS v Free Mobile SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Legal protection of computer programs — Directive 2009/24/EC — Software licence agreement — Unauthorised modification of the source code of a computer program by a licensee in breach of the licence agreement — Action for infringement brought by the author of the program against the licensee — Nature of the applicable liability regime)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.
36700Case C-447/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovak Republic) — UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 3 — Matters covered — Old-age benefit — Freedom of movement for workers within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7 — Equal treatment of national workers and migrant workers — Social advantages — Legislation of a Member State restricting the grant of an ‘additional benefit for sportspersons who have represented the State’ to the citizens of that State)cjeu_case · 18 декабря 2019 г.