Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
3641

Case T-399/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – ClientEarth and Collectif Nourrir v Commission (Agriculture – CAP Strategic Plan – Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 – Rules on support for strategic plans drawn up by Member States under the CAP – Commission approval – Rejection of the request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 13 of Regulation 2021/2115 – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
3642

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl and Unisystems systimata pliroforikis monoprosopi anonymi emporiki etairia v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of development, consultancy and support services in the field of information systems – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Determination of the applicable substantive law – Applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-750/22.

cjeu_case ·
3643

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl and Unisystems systimata pliroforikis monoprosopi anonymi emporiki etairia v European Securities and Markets Authority.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of development, consultancy and support services in the field of information systems – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Determination of the applicable substantive law – Applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-750/22.

cjeu_case ·
3644

Case T-750/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – UniSystems Luxembourg and Unisystems systimata pliroforikis v ESMA (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of development, consultancy and support services in the field of information systems – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Abnormally low tender – Determination of the applicable substantive law – Applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law – Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
3645

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance mancozeb – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance – Manifest error of assessment – Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.#Case T-742/20 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
3646

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance mancozeb – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance – Manifest error of assessment – Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.#Case T-742/20 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
3647

Case T-742/20 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2025 – UPL Europe and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance mancozeb – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Procedure for assessing the application for renewal of approval of an active substance – Manifest error of assessment – Procedure for harmonised classification and labelling – Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008)

cjeu_case ·
3649

Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
3650

Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
3652

Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2025.#DLF Beet Seed ApS and United Beet Seeds v European Chemicals Agency.#Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘information [relating] to emissions into the environment’ – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case.#Case T-305/25 R.

cjeu_case ·
3654

Case T-305/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 October 2025 – DLF Beet Seed and United Beet Seeds v ECHA (Interim relief – Access to documents – Regulation (EU) No 649/2012 – Export notifications for hazardous chemicals that are banned or severely restricted within the European Union – Documents concerning the applicants held by ECHA – Decision to grant a third party access to the documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Concept of information [relating] to emissions into the environment – Application for interim measures – No prima facie case)

cjeu_case ·