Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
36561

Case T-211/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Vanda Pharmaceuticals v Commission (Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fanaptum — iloperidone — Commission refusal decision — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

cjeu_case ·
36564

Case T-22/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — Bulgaria v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Bulgaria — Rural development — Quality of on-the-spot checks — Review of eligibility and selection criteria — Financial corrections — Ex post controls — Method for calculating financial corrections — Recurrence — Corrective measures — Conformity clearance procedure — Legal certainty — Principle of sound financial management — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
36566

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of locus standi — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-757/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36567

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#M-Sansz Kereskedelmi, Termelő és Szolgáltató Kft. (M-Sansz Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of locus standi — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-757/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36568

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of standing — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-748/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36569

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Motex Ipari és Szolgáltató Rehabilitációs Kft. (Motex Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of standing — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-748/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36570

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Lux-Rehab Foglalkoztató Non-Profit Kft. (Lux-Rehab Non-Profit Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of locus standi — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-747/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36571

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Lux-Rehab Foglalkoztató Non-Profit Kft. (Lux-Rehab Non-Profit Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of companies employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Lack of locus standi — Person not individually concerned — Action not brought in order to safeguard procedural rights — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-747/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36572

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft. (OPS Újpest Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Deadline for lodging an appeal — Starting point — Awareness of the existence of the contested measure — Request for translation of the contested measure — Reasonable time — Out of time — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Assessment of the facts — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded).#Case C-741/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36573

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#OPS Újpesti Csökkentmunkaképességűek Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft. (OPS Újpest Kft.) v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State Aid — Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers — Action for annulment — Alleged decisions not to raise objections — Deadline for lodging an appeal — Starting point — Awareness of the existence of the contested measure — Request for translation of the contested measure — Reasonable time — Out of time — Inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Assessment of the facts — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded).#Case C-741/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
36574

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NE v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Finanzpolizei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Freedom to provide services — Posting of workers — Article 56 TFEU — Directive 2014/67/EU — Articles 9 and 20 — Reporting of workers — Retention of records of wages — Penalties — Proportionality — Fines of a predefined minimum amount — Cumulative — No upper limit — Court fees.#Case C-645/18.

cjeu_case ·
36575

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NE v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Finanzpolizei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Freedom to provide services — Posting of workers — Article 56 TFEU — Directive 2014/67/EU — Articles 9 and 20 — Reporting of workers — Retention of records of wages — Penalties — Proportionality — Fines of a predefined minimum amount — Cumulative — No upper limit — Court fees.#Case C-645/18.

cjeu_case ·
36576

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

cjeu_case ·
36577

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v Freistaat Bayern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Article 6, the first paragraph of Article 47 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Directive 2008/50/EC — Atmospheric pollution — Ambient air quality — Air quality plan — Limit values for nitrogen dioxide — Obligation to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that any exceedance period is very short — Obligation on the national courts to take any necessary measure — Refusal of a regional government to comply with an injunction — Coercive detention contemplated in respect of senior political representatives or senior officials of the region concerned — Effective judicial protection — Right to liberty of the person — Legal basis — Proportionality.#Case C-752/18.

cjeu_case ·
36578

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 19 décembre 2019.#Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven e.V. contre Finanzamt Cuxhaven.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 98 – Faculté pour les États membres d’appliquer un taux réduit de TVA à certaines livraisons de biens et prestations de services – Annexe III, point 12 – Taux réduit de TVA applicable à la location d’emplacements de camping et d’emplacements pour caravanes – Question de l’application de ce taux réduit à la location d’emplacements d’amarrage pour bateaux dans un port de plaisance – Comparaison avec la location d’emplacements pour le stationnement de véhicules – Égalité de traitement – Principe de neutralité fiscale.#Affaire C-715/18.

cjeu_case ·
36579

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven e.V. v Finanzamt Cuxhaven.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Point 12 of Annex III — Reduced rate of VAT applicable to the letting of places on camping or caravan sites — Question of whether that reduced rate is applicable to the letting of boat moorings in a marina — Comparison with the letting of premises and sites for the parking of vehicles — Equal treatment — Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Case C-715/18.

cjeu_case ·
36580

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 19 décembre 2019.#Amărăşti Land Investment SRL contre Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Timişoara et Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Timiş.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée – Directive 2006/112/CE – Opérations imposables – Déduction de la taxe payée en amont – Acquisition de biens immobiliers non inscrits au registre foncier national – Dépenses liées à la première inscription audit registre prises en charge par l’acquéreur – Recours à des sociétés tierces spécialisées – Entremise dans une prestation de services ou dépenses d’investissement effectuées pour les besoins d’une entreprise.#Affaire C-707/18.

cjeu_case ·