3601Case C-689/25, Łuneka: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 29 October 2025 – Bank BPH S.A. v KP and PPcjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3602Case C-688/25, Huther Immobilien Mannheim: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 October 2025 – AR v Huther Immobilien Mannheim GmbHcjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3603Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark THERMATEC – Earlier EU figurative mark Termatek – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-611/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3604Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark THERMATEC – Earlier EU figurative mark Termatek – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-611/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3605Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Itron, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ITRON – Earlier EU word marks ITRON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distance between the goods and services in question.#Case T-565/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3606Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Itron, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ITRON – Earlier EU word marks ITRON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Distance between the goods and services in question.#Case T-565/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3607Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing warning lights – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-554/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3608Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing warning lights – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-554/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3609Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing a part of a warning light – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-550/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3610Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Ningbo Vasa Intelligent Technology Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – EU design representing a part of a warning light – Ground for invalidity – Non-compliance with requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Proof of disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Indication and reproduction of the earlier designs – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(2) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002, in its earlier version.#Case T-550/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3611Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#FU v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Social security – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Accident – Rejection of the accident report – Out of time submission of the accident report – Failure to observe the period of 10 working days from the occurrence of the accident – Concept of ‘lawful reason’.#Case T-530/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3612Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#FU v European Parliament.#Civil service – Officials – Social security – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Accident – Rejection of the accident report – Out of time submission of the accident report – Failure to observe the period of 10 working days from the occurrence of the accident – Concept of ‘lawful reason’.#Case T-530/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3613Arrêt du Tribunal (septième chambre) du 29 octobre 2025.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Marque de l’Union européenne verbale Powerball – Cause de nullité absolue – Article 52, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 – Mauvaise foi.#Affaire T-375/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3614Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#European Lotto and Betting ltd. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Powerball – Absolute ground for invalidity – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Bad faith.#Case T-375/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3615Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3616Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3617Arrêt du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 29 octobre 2025.#Arina Evgheni Corşicova contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises en raison des actions déstabilisant la Moldavie – Gel des fonds – Restriction en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques ou faisant l’objet de restrictions en matière d’admission sur le territoire des États membres – Maintien du nom de la requérante sur les listes – Atteinte au processus politique démocratique et déstabilisation de l’ordre constitutionnel – Diffusion de fausses déclarations et de désinformation – Article 1er, paragraphe 1, sous a), i), et article 2, paragraphe 1, sous a), i), de la décision (PESC) 2023/891 – Article 2, paragraphe 3, sous a), i), du règlement (UE) 2023/888 – Association à une personne inscrite sur les listes – Article 1er, paragraphe 1, sous b), et article 2, paragraphe 1, sous b), de la décision 2023/891 – Article 2, paragraphe 3, sous b), du règlement 2023/888 – Obligation de motivation – Exception d’illégalité – Erreurs d’appréciation – Liberté d’entreprise – Droit de propriété – Liberté d’association – Liberté d’expression – Responsabilité non contractuelle.#Affaire T-345/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3618Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Arina Evgheni Corşicova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists – Undermining of the democratic political process and destabilisation of the constitutional order – Dissemination of false statements and disinformation – Article 1(1)(a)(i) and Article 2(1)(a)(i) of Decision (CFSP) 2023/891 – Article 2(3)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2023/888 – Association with a person included on the lists – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(b) of Decision 2023/891 – Article 2(3)(b) of Regulation 2023/888 – Obligation to state reasons – Plea of illegality – Errors of assessment – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Freedom of association – Freedom of expression – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-345/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3619Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#KF v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Social security – Invalidity Committee – Refusal to recognise invalidity – Implementation of the terms of a settlement agreement – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-330/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.
3620Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#KF v European Investment Bank.#Case T-330/24.cjeu_case · 29 октября 2025 г.