36161Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 30 janvier 2020.#Anton van Zantbeek VOF contre Ministerraad.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 56 TFUE – Article 36 de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen – Libre prestation des services – Taxe sur les opérations de bourse conclues ou exécutées dans un État membre – Différence de traitement au détriment de destinataires de services faisant appel à des intermédiaires professionnels non-résidents – Restriction – Justification.#Affaire C-725/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36162Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Anton van Zantbeek VOF v Ministerraad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Freedom to provide services — Tax on stock exchange transactions concluded or executed in a Member State — Difference in treatment to the detriment of recipients of services using non-resident professional intermediaries — Restriction — Justification.#Case C-725/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36163Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#České dráhy a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20(4) — Inspection decisions — Duty to state reasons — Reasonable grounds for finding an infringement of competition rules — Evidence lawfully gathered — Inspection ordered on the basis of evidence obtained from a previous inspection.#Joined Cases C-538/18 P and C-539/18 P.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36164Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#České dráhy a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20(4) — Inspection decisions — Duty to state reasons — Reasonable grounds for finding an infringement of competition rules — Evidence lawfully gathered — Inspection ordered on the basis of evidence obtained from a previous inspection.#Joined Cases C-538/18 P and C-539/18 P.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36165Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Information and consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Implementing Decision 2013/63/EU — Nutritional and health claims made on foods — Article 10(3) — Reference to general, non-specific benefits — Concept of ‘accompanying’ a specific health claim — Obligation to produce scientific evidence — Scope.#Case C-524/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36166Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Information and consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Implementing Decision 2013/63/EU — Nutritional and health claims made on foods — Article 10(3) — Reference to general, non-specific benefits — Concept of ‘accompanying’ a specific health claim — Obligation to produce scientific evidence — Scope.#Case C-524/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36167Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 30 janvier 2020.#Autoservizi Giordano società cooperativa contre Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli - Ufficio di Palermo.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Directive 2003/96/CE – Article 7, paragraphes 2 et 3 – Notion de “gazole à usage commercial utilisé comme carburant” – Réglementation nationale prévoyant un taux d’accise réduit pour le gazole à usage commercial utilisé comme carburant pour le transport régulier de passagers, et non pour le transport occasionnel de passagers – Principe d’égalité de traitement.#Affaire C-513/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36168Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Autoservizi Giordano società cooperativa v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli - Ufficio di Palermo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Palermo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 7(2) and (3) — Concept of ‘commercial gas oil used as propellant’ — National legislation levying a duty on commercial gas oil used as propellant for the regular carriage of passengers but not for the occasional carriage of passengers — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-513/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36169Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 30 janvier 2020.#Tim SpA – Direzione e coordinamento Vivendi SA contre Consip SpA et Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation de marchés publics de fournitures, de travaux ou de services – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 18, paragraphe 2 – Article 57, paragraphe 4 – Motifs d’exclusion facultatifs – Motif d’exclusion frappant un sous-traitant mentionné dans l’offre de l’opérateur économique – Manquement du sous-traitant aux obligations en matière de droit environnemental, social et du travail – Réglementation nationale prévoyant une exclusion automatique de l’opérateur économique pour un tel manquement.#Affaire C-395/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36170Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Tim SpA - Direzione e coordinamento Vivendi SA v Consip SpA and Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement of supplies, works or services — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 18(2) — Article 57(4) — Optional grounds for exclusion — Ground for exclusion of a subcontractor mentioned in the economic operator’s tender — Subcontractor’s failure to comply with environmental, social and labour law obligations — National legislation providing for automatic exclusion of the economic operator for such a failure.#Case C-395/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36171Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#I.G.I. Srl v Maria Grazia Cicenia and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 82/891/EEC — Articles 12 and 19 — Division of limited liability companies — Protection of the interests of the creditors of the company being divided — Nullity of the division — Actio pauliana.#Case C-394/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36172Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#I.G.I. Srl v Maria Grazia Cicenia and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 82/891/EEC — Articles 12 and 19 — Division of limited liability companies — Protection of the interests of the creditors of the company being divided — Nullity of the division — Actio pauliana.#Case C-394/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36173Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Pharmaceutical products — Barriers to the entry on the market of generic medicines arising from settlement agreements (relating to disputes concerning process patents) concluded by a manufacturer of originator medicines who is the holder of those patents and manufacturers of generic products – Article 101 TFEU — Potential competition — Restriction by object — Characterisation — Restriction by effect — Assessment of effects — Article 102 TFEU — Relevant market – Inclusion of generic medicines in the relevant market — Abuse of dominant position — Characterisation — Justifications.#Case C-307/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36174Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 30 January 2020.#Generics (UK) Ltd and Others v Competition and Markets Authority.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Pharmaceutical products — Barriers to the entry on the market of generic medicines arising from settlement agreements (relating to disputes concerning process patents) concluded by a manufacturer of originator medicines who is the holder of those patents and manufacturers of generic products — Article 101 TFEU — Potential competition — Restriction by object — Characterisation — Restriction by effect — Assessment of effects — Article 102 TFEU — Relevant market — Inclusion of generic medicines in the relevant market — Abuse of dominant position — Characterisation — Justification.#Case C-307/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36175Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 30 January 2020.#ratiopharm GmbH v Novartis Consumer Health GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of public health – Internal market – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Advertising – Article 96 – Distribution of free samples of medicinal products to persons qualified to prescribe them – Pharmacists excluded from the distribution of free samples of medicinal products – Inapplicability to distribution of free samples of non-prescription medicinal products – Consequences for the Member States.#Case C-786/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36176Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 30 January 2020.#Interseroh Dienstleistungs GmbH v SAA Sonderabfallagentur Baden-Württemberg GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Shipment of waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Prior written notification and consent procedure – General information requirements – Annex IIIA – Mixture of paper, paperboard and paper products – Code B3020 of Annex IX to the Basel Convention – Impurities – Mixture contaminated by other materials – Recovery in an environmentally sound manner.#Case C-654/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36177Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 30 January 2020.#XZ v Ibercaja Banco, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción no 3 de Teruel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer Protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan agreement — Term limiting the variability of the interest rate (‘floor’ term) — Novation agreement — Waiver of the right to bring an action contesting the terms of a contract — Non-binding.#Case C-452/18.cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36178Case C-725/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Anton van Zantbeek VOF v Ministerraad (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Article 36 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area — Freedom to provide services — Tax on stock exchange transactions concluded or executed in a Member State — Difference in treatment to the detriment of recipients of services using non-resident professional intermediaries — Restriction — Justification)cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36179Joined Cases C-538/18 P and C-539/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2020 — České dráhy a.s. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20(4) — Inspection decisions — Duty to state reasons — Reasonable grounds for finding an infringement of competition rules — Evidence lawfully gathered — Inspection ordered on the basis of evidence obtained from a previous inspection)cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.
36180Case C-524/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 January 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public health — Information and consumer protection — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Implementing Decision 2013/63/EU — Nutritional and health claims made on foods — Article 10(3) — Reference to general, non-specific benefits — Concept of ‘accompanying’ a specific health claim — Obligation to produce scientific evidence — Scope)cjeu_case · 30 января 2020 г.