35781Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#Gardinia Home Decor GmbH v Hauptzollamt Ulm.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EEC) no 2658/87 — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheading 8302 41 90 — Metal curtain rods.#Case C-670/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35782Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-implementation — Article 260(2) TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Lump sum.#Case C-298/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35783Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-implementation — Article 260(2) TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Lump sum.#Case C-298/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35784Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 27 février 2020.#République de Lituanie contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – FEOGA, FEAGA et Feader – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République de Lituanie – Aide à la retraite anticipée – Règlement (CE) no 1257/1999 – Article 33 quindecies, paragraphe 1 – Dénaturation des éléments de preuve.#Affaire C-79/19 P.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35785Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#Republic of Lithuania v European Commission.#Appeal — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Lithuania — Aid for early retirement — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Article 33m(1) — Distortion of the evidence.#Case C-79/19 P.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35786Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 27 février 2020.#Corporis Sp. z o.o. contre Gefion Insurance A/S.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2009/138/CE – Représentation d’une entreprise d’assurance non-vie – Représentant domicilié sur le territoire national – Signification ou notification des actes – Réception de l’acte introductif d’instance – Règlement (CE) no 1393/2007 – Non‑applicabilité.#Affaire C-25/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35787Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#Corporis Sp. z o.o. v Gefion Insurance A/S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2009/138/EC — Representation of a non-life insurance undertaking — Representative permanently resident in national territory — Service of documents — Receipt of the document initiating proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 — Non-applicability.#Case C-25/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35788Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 27 February 2020.#Ruska Federacija v I.N.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovni sud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — EEA Agreement — Non-discrimination — Article 36 — Freedom to provide services — Scope — Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis — Agreement on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway — Extradition to a third State of an Icelandic national — Protection of a Member State’s nationals against extradition — No equivalent protection for nationals of another State — Icelandic national who was granted asylum under national law before acquiring Icelandic citizenship — Restriction of freedom of movement — Justification based on the prevention of impunity — Proportionality — Verification of the guarantees provided for in Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-897/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35789Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 27 February 2020.#Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Annex III, point 1 – Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ – Aphrodisiac products.#Case C-331/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35790Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 27 February 2020.#LE v Transportes Aéreos Portugueses SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Juízo Local Cível de Lisboa – Juiz 18.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(3) — Article 7(1) — Compensation to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Exemption — Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ — Unruly passengers — Possibility of relying on the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance in respect of a flight not affected by that circumstance– Concept of ‘reasonable measures’.#Case C-74/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35791Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 27 February 2020.#FX v GZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance obligations — Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 — Article 41(1) — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 24(5) — Maintenance order declared enforceable — Application opposing enforcement — Jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of enforcement.#Case C-41/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35792Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 27 February 2020.#WM v Stadt Frankfurt am Main.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Conditions of detention — Article 16(1) — Detention in prison accommodation for the purpose of removal — Third-country national who poses a serious threat to public policy or public security.#Case C-18/19.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35793Case C-298/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/676/EEC — Protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Non-compliance — Article 260(2), TFEU — Pecuniary penalties — Lump sum)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35794Case C-79/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 — Republic of Lithuania v European Commission (Appeal — EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Lithuania — Aid for early retirement — Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 — Article 33m(1) — Distortion of the evidence)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35795Case C-25/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Poznaniu — Poland) — Corporis sp. z o.o. v Gefion Insurance A/S (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2009/138/EC — Representation of a non-life insurance undertaking — Representative permanently resident in national territory — Service of documents — Receipt of the document initiating proceedings — Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 — Non-applicability)cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35796Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 27 février 2020.#Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real contre RH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 20 TFUE – Citoyenneté de l’Union européenne – Citoyen de l’Union n’ayant jamais exercé sa liberté de circulation – Demande de carte de séjour temporaire du conjoint, ressortissant d’un pays tiers – Rejet – Obligation de subvenir aux besoins du conjoint – Absence de ressources suffisantes du citoyen de l’Union – Obligation des conjoints de vivre ensemble – Législation et pratique nationales – Jouissance effective de l’essentiel des droits conférés aux citoyens de l’Union – Privation.#Affaire C-836/18.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35797Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla-La Mancha.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 20 TFEU — European Union citizens — Union citizen who has never exercised the freedom of movement — Application for a temporary residence permit for the spouse, who is a third-country national — Rejection — Obligation to support the spouse — Union citizen having insufficient resources — Obligation of the spouses to live together — National legislation and practice — Effective enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred on Union citizens — Deprived.#Case C-836/18.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35798Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 27 février 2020.#AAS « Balta » contre UAB « Grifs AG ».#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 15, point 5, et article 16, point 5 – Assurance de “grands risques” – Clause attributive de juridiction conclue entre le preneur d’assurance et l’assureur – Opposabilité de cette clause à la personne assurée.#Affaire C-803/18.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35799Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 February 2020.#AAS „BALTA“ v UAB „GRIFS AG“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 15, point 5 and Article 16, point 5 — Insurance of ‘large risks’ — Jurisdiction clause agreed upon by the policyholder and the insurer — Whether that clause may be relied on against the insured person.#Case C-803/18.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.
35800Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 27 février 2020.#TK e.a. contre Land Sachsen-Anhalt.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Directive 2000/78/CE – Articles 2 et 6 – Interdiction de toute discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Rémunération des fonctionnaires – Système de rémunération discriminatoire – Rappel de rémunération calculé sur la base d’un classement discriminatoire antérieur – Nouvelle discrimination – Article 9 – Indemnisation du fait d’une législation discriminatoire – Délai de forclusion pour introduire une demande d’indemnisation – Principes d’équivalence et d’effectivité.#Affaires jointes C-773/18 à C-775/18.cjeu_case · 27 февраля 2020 г.