35121Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#Ryanair Ltd and Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato - Antitrust and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Air services — Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 — Article 23(1) — Indication of the final price to be paid — Online passenger check-in fees — VAT — Administrative fees for purchases made by means of a credit card other than that approved by the air carrier — Unavoidable and foreseeable elements of the final price to be paid — Optional price supplements — Concept.#Case C-28/19.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35122Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 23 April 2020.#FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylum and immigration policy — Directive 2013/32/EU — Application for international protection — Article 33(2) — Grounds of inadmissibility — Article 40 — Subsequent applications — Article 43 — Border procedures — Directive 2013/33/EU — Article 2(h) and Articles 8 and 9 — Detention — Whether lawful — Directive 2008/115/EU — Article 13 — Effective remedies — Article 15 — Detention — Whether lawful — Right to an effective remedy — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Principle of primacy of EU law.#Joined Cases C-924/19 PPU and C-925/19 PPU.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35123Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 April 2020.#XT v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos and Vilniaus apskrities valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/112/EC – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Article 9(1) – Article 193 – Concept of ‘taxable person’ – Joint activity agreement – Partnership – Allocation of an economic transaction to one of the partners – Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax.#Case C-312/19.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35124Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 April 2020.#European External Action Service v Chantal Hebberecht.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Policy of rotating officials – Position of Head of the European Union Delegation to Ethiopia – Decision refusing to extend the assignment to that position – Interests of the service – Principle of equal treatment – Positive discrimination in favour of the under-represented sex – Article 1d of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.#Case C-93/19 P.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35125Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 April 2020.#Kaplan International colleges UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 132(1)(f) – Exemption of supplies of services made by independent groups of persons to their members – Applicability to VAT groups – Article 11 – VAT group.#Case C-77/19.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35126Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 23 April 2020.#Belgische Staat and Directeur-Generaal van de Algemene Directie Controle en Bemiddeling van de FOD Economie, K.M.O., Middenstand en Energie v Movic BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Action for the cessation of unfair commercial practices brought by a public authority to protect the interests of consumers.#Case C-73/19.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35127Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 23 April 2020.#Repsol Petróleo, SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Article 21(3) – Absence of chargeable event giving rise to taxation – Consumption of energy products within the curtilage of an establishment in which they were produced for the production of final energy products from which non-energy products are also inevitably produced.#Case C-44/19.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35128Case C-880/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — VZ v Eurowings GmbHcjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35129Case C-785/19: Order of the President of the Court of 23 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken — Germany) — Koch Media GmbH v HCcjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35130Case C-237/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Gömböc Kutató, Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. v Szellemi Tulajdon Nemzeti Hivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Refusal or invalidation of registration — Three-dimensional mark — Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Sign consisting of the shape which gives substantial value to the goods — Consideration of the perception of the relevant public)cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35131Case C-217/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Finland (Action for failure to fulfil obligations — Directive 2009/147/EC — Conservation of wild birds — Authorisations for spring hunting of male specimens of the ‘common eider’ bird species (Somateria mollissima) in the province of Åland (Finland) — Article 7(4) and Article 9(1)(c) — Concepts of ‘judicious use’ and ‘small numbers’)cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35132Case C-161/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2009/147/EC — Conservation of wild birds — Authorisations for spring hunting of male specimens of the bird species ‘Eurasian woodcock’ (Scolopax rusticola) in Lower Austria (Austria) — Article 7(4) and Article 9(1)(c) — ‘No other satisfactory solution’ — Concept of ‘small numbers’)cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35133Joined Cases C-101/19 and C-102/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Deutsche Homöopathie-Union (DHU) Arzneimittel GmbH & Co. KG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (References for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Articles 62 and 69 — Particulars on the labelling and package leaflet of homeopathic medicinal products — Exhaustive list of the particulars or possibility to add information that is useful to the patient and is compatible with the summary of product characteristics — Dosage schedules for homeopathic medicinal products)cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35134Case C-28/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Ryanair Ltd, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato — Antitrust v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato — Antitrust, Ryanair Ltd, Ryanair DAC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Air services — Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 — Article 23(1) — Indication of the final price to be paid — Online passenger check-in fees — VAT — Administrative fees for purchases made by means of a credit card other than that approved by the air carrier — Unavoidable and foreseeable elements of the final price to be paid — Optional price supplements — Concept)cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35135Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Figurative mark containing the word element GUGLER — Application for a declaration of invalidity brought by Gugler France SA — Economic link between the party seeking a declaration of invalidity and the proprietor of the contested mark — No likelihood of confusion.#Case C-736/18 P.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35136Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Figurative mark containing the word element GUGLER — Application for a declaration of invalidity brought by Gugler France SA — Economic link between the party seeking a declaration of invalidity and the proprietor of the contested mark — No likelihood of confusion.#Case C-736/18 P.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35137Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 23 avril 2020.#WN contre Land Niedersachsen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Article 45, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Rémunération – Classement dans les échelons d’un système de rémunération – Système de rémunération liant le bénéfice d’une rémunération plus élevée à l’ancienneté acquise auprès du même employeur – Limitation de la prise en compte des périodes antérieures d’activité pertinente accomplies auprès d’un employeur situé dans un État membre autre que l’État membre d’origine.#Affaire C-710/18.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35138Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#WN v Land Niedersachsen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 45(1) TFEU — Remuneration — Step allocation in a remuneration system — Remuneration system linking entitlement to a higher remuneration rate to length of service with the same employer — Limitation of the account to be taken of previous periods of relevant activity with an employer in a Member State other than the Member State of origin.#Case C-710/18.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35139Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 23 avril 2020.#Wagram Invest SA contre État belge.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 78/660/CEE – Comptes annuels de certaines formes de sociétés – Principe de l’image fidèle – Acquisition d’une immobilisation financière par une société anonyme – Inscription en charge au compte de résultat d’un escompte lié à une dette à plus d’un an, non productive d’intérêts, et inscription du prix d’acquisition de l’immobilisation à l’actif du bilan, sous déduction de l’escompte.#Affaire C-640/18.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.
35140Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 23 April 2020.#Wagram Invest SA v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Mons.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 78/660/EEC – Annual accounts of certain types of companies – Principle that a true and fair view must be given – Acquisition of a financial fixed asset by a public limited company – Entry as a charge in the profit and loss account of a discount relating to a non-interest-bearing debt due after one year and entry of the purchase price of the fixed asset as an asset in the balance sheet after deduction of the discount.#Case C-640/18.cjeu_case · 23 апреля 2020 г.